Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26120134›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015

Receptionist rECognition and rEferral of Patients with Stroke (RECEPTS): unannounced simulated patient telephone call study in primary care.

Ruth M Mellor, James P Sheppard, Elizabeth Bates, George Bouliotis, Janet Jones, Satinder Singh, John Skelton, Connie Wiskin, Richard J McManus

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The future role of receptionists in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stroke detection and prevention in atrial fibrillation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ruth M MellorNHS Lanarkshire, Kirklands, Bothwell.
James P SheppardDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Elizabeth BatesPrimary Care Clinical Sciences;
George BouliotisPrimary Care Clinical Research & Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
Janet JonesPrimary Care Clinical Sciences;
Satinder SinghNorthfield Health Centre (Tudor Practice), Birmingham.
John SkeltonPrimary Care Clinical Sciences;
Connie WiskinPrimary Care Clinical Sciences;
Richard J McManusDepartment of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-015Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Timely recognition and referral are essential for treatment.

aimTo examine the ability of receptionists in general practices to recognise symptoms of stroke and direct patients to emergency care. DESIGN AND

settingUnannounced simulated patient telephone calls and prospective cross-sectional survey study in general practices in the Birmingham and Solihull area.

methodA total of 52 general practices participated in a total of 520 simulated telephone calls, with 183 receptionists completing questionnaires. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine likelihood of referral for immediate care by ease of vignette recognition and number of common stroke symptoms present.

resultsGeneral practice receptionists correctly referred 69% of simulated calls for immediate care. Calls classed as 'difficult' to recognise were less likely to be immediately referred. Compared with 'easy' calls: 'difficult' calls odds ratio (OR) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.08 to 0.26; 'moderate' calls OR 0.55, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.92. Similarly, calls including one or two 'FAST' symptoms were less likely to be referred immediately (compared with three FAST symptoms: one symptom OR 0.30, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.72; two symptoms OR 0.35, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.83).

conclusionGeneral practice receptionists refer patients with stroke for immediate care when they present with several symptoms; however, they are less likely to refer patients presenting with only one symptom or less common symptoms of stroke. Optimum management of acute stroke in primary care requires interventions that improve receptionists' knowledge of lesser-known stroke symptoms.

Indexed as

Patient SimulationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMedical ReceptionistsMorbidityPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationStrokeSurveys and QuestionnairesTelephoneUnited Kingdomgeneral practicehealth services administrationmedical receptionistspatient simulationquestionnairesstroke

Identifiers

PMID26120134
PMCPMC4484942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.