ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015
Receptionist rECognition and rEferral of Patients with Stroke (RECEPTS): unannounced simulated patient telephone call study in primary care.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Pooled it
- Primary health care provider availability and accessibility: a comparison of responses from providers and their office staff, results from the Models and Access Atlas of Primary Care - Nova Scotia (MAAP-NS) population study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Enhancing access to primary care is critical to the future of an equitable health service: using process visualisation to understand the impact of national policy in the UK.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Understanding the invisible workforce: lessons for general practice from a survey of receptionists.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- A quantitative assessment of the parameters of the role of receptionists in modern primary care using the work design framework.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Ability of the wider dental team to triage patients with acute conditions: a qualitative study.British dental journal · 2020Article
- The future role of receptionists in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017Article
- Exploring the clinically orientated roles of the general practice receptionist: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2017Article
- Service factors causing delay in specialist assessment for TIA and minor stroke: a qualitative study of GP and patient perspectives.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Stroke detection and prevention in atrial fibrillation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Timely recognition and referral are essential for treatment.
aimTo examine the ability of receptionists in general practices to recognise symptoms of stroke and direct patients to emergency care. DESIGN AND
settingUnannounced simulated patient telephone calls and prospective cross-sectional survey study in general practices in the Birmingham and Solihull area.
methodA total of 52 general practices participated in a total of 520 simulated telephone calls, with 183 receptionists completing questionnaires. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine likelihood of referral for immediate care by ease of vignette recognition and number of common stroke symptoms present.
resultsGeneral practice receptionists correctly referred 69% of simulated calls for immediate care. Calls classed as 'difficult' to recognise were less likely to be immediately referred. Compared with 'easy' calls: 'difficult' calls odds ratio (OR) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.08 to 0.26; 'moderate' calls OR 0.55, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.92. Similarly, calls including one or two 'FAST' symptoms were less likely to be referred immediately (compared with three FAST symptoms: one symptom OR 0.30, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.72; two symptoms OR 0.35, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.83).
conclusionGeneral practice receptionists refer patients with stroke for immediate care when they present with several symptoms; however, they are less likely to refer patients presenting with only one symptom or less common symptoms of stroke. Optimum management of acute stroke in primary care requires interventions that improve receptionists' knowledge of lesser-known stroke symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.