SynthesisLung2015
Maintenance Therapy Improves Survival Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis of 14 Studies.
Synthesis in Lung, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Doublet vs Single-Agent Maintenance Therapy in the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Drug design, development and therapy · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy and toxicities of combination maintenance therapy in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an up-to-date meta-analysis.Bioscience reports · 2019Pooled it
- The role of maintenance therapy in the treatment of elderly non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Drug design, development and therapy · 2017Pooled it
- Randomised Phase 2 study of maintenance linsitinib (OSI-906) in combination with erlotinib compared with placebo plus erlotinib after platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.British journal of cancer · 2017Trial
- Changes in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis, molecular testing and prognosis 2011-2016.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Molecular Pathology and Personalized Medicine: The Dawn of a New Era in Companion Diagnostics-Practical Considerations about Companion Diagnostics for Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2016Review
- Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience.OncoTargets and therapy · 2016Article
- Maintenance Therapy Improves Survival Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Lung · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim was to investigate whether maintenance therapy (MT) is sufficient or not to improve overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS) of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1990 and 2013 were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, ISTP, clinicaltrials.org, and ASCO conference proceeding. Patients' characteristics, OS, progress-free survival, and hazard ratios were extracted. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.2. Fourteen RCTs involving 6198 individuals were included.
resultsCompared with placebo, observation or best supportive care (BSC), patients receiving single agent (SA) MT had an improved OS (hazard ratio, HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.91; p < 0.05) and PFS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.57-0.73; p < 0.05). In a sub-group analysis of SA MT versus placebo, observation or BSC, we found that switch MT using SA provided an improved OS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.91; p < 0.05). For multiple agent (MA) versus SA MT, a prolonged PFS (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.88; p < 0.05) but not OS (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86-1.07; p > 0.05) was observed for MA. A significant prolonged PFS was observed in MA switch MT (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.86; p < 0.05) versus SA MT. However, no significant improvement in OS was observed for MA versus SA MT, indicating that switch MT (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.73-1.12; p > 0.05) and continuous MT (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.11; p > 0.05) showed similar effect on OS.
conclusionSA switch MT is associated with improved OS and PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC. MA switch MT is sufficient to improve PFS, but not OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26119960What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.