Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26119841›Full record

ArticleJournal of evolutionary biology2015

How mechanisms of habitat preference evolve and promote divergence with gene flow.

D Berner, X Thibert-Plante

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Coupling of Barriers to Gene Exchange: Causes and Consequences.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  7. A generalised approach to the study and understanding of adaptive evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Towards the completion of speciation: the evolution of reproductive isolation beyond the first barriers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

D BernerZoological Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
X Thibert-PlanteNational Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3982-0829
National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis · USUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

NEW APPROACHES TO THE MODELING OF SPECIATIONR01GM056693 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI GAVRILETS, SERGEY Y · 1998 to 2010
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM56693NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Habitat preference may promote adaptive divergence and speciation, yet the conditions under which this is likely are insufficiently explored. We use individual-based simulations to study the evolution and consequence of habitat preference during divergence with gene flow, considering four different underlying genetically based behavioural mechanisms: natal habitat imprinting, phenotype-dependent, competition-dependent and direct genetic habitat preference. We find that the evolution of habitat preference generally requires initially high dispersal, is facilitated by asymmetry in population sizes between habitats, and is hindered by an increasing number of underlying genetic loci. Moreover, the probability of habitat preference to emerge and promote divergence differs greatly among the underlying mechanisms. Natal habitat imprinting evolves most easily and can allow full divergence in parameter ranges where no divergence is possible in the absence of habitat preference. The reason is that imprinting represents a one-allele mechanism of assortative mating linking dispersal behaviour very effectively to local selection. At the other extreme, direct genetic habitat preference, a two-allele mechanism, evolves under restricted conditions only, and even then facilitates divergence weakly. Overall, our results indicate that habitat preference can be a strong reproductive barrier promoting divergence with gene flow, but that this is highly contingent on the underlying preference mechanism.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionEcosystemModels, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalComputer SimulationGene FlowGenetic SpeciationGenomic ImprintingModels, Biologicalimprintingindividual-based simulationlocal adaptationnonrandom dispersalparapatric speciationphenotypic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID26119841
PMCPMC4573339
OpenAlexW1843657066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.