Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26119132›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2015

The circulating transcriptome as a source of non-invasive cancer biomarkers: concepts and controversies of non-coding and coding RNA in body fluids.

Marta Fernandez-Mercado, Lorea Manterola, Erika Larrea, Ibai Goicoechea, María Arestin, María Armesto, David Otaegui, Charles H Lawrie

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The BCGMethodsX · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. MicroRNAs in Metastasis and the Tumour Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Novel Molecular Markers in Glioblastoma-Benefits of Liquid Biopsy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta Fernandez-MercadoOncology Area, Biodonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain.
Lorea ManterolaOncology Area, Biodonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain.
Erika LarreaOncology Area, Biodonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain.
Ibai GoicoecheaOncology Area, Biodonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain.
María ArestinOncology Area, Biodonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain.
María ArmestoOncology Area, Biodonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain.
David OtaeguiMultiple Sclerosis Group, Biodonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain.
Charles H LawrieOncology Area, Biodonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain.
Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESIkerbasque · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gold standard for cancer diagnosis remains the histological examination of affected tissue, obtained either by surgical excision, or radiologically guided biopsy. Such procedures however are expensive, not without risk to the patient, and require consistent evaluation by expert pathologists. Consequently, the search for non-invasive tools for the diagnosis and management of cancer has led to great interest in the field of circulating nucleic acids in plasma and serum. An additional benefit of blood-based testing is the ability to carry out screening and repeat sampling on patients undergoing therapy, or monitoring disease progression allowing for the development of a personalized approach to cancer patient management. Despite having been discovered over 60 years ago, the clear clinical potential of circulating nucleic acids, with the notable exception of prenatal diagnostic testing, has yet to translate into the clinic. The recent discovery of non-coding (nc) RNA (in particular micro(mi)RNAs) in the blood has provided fresh impetuous for the field. In this review, we discuss the potential of the circulating transcriptome (coding and ncRNA), as novel cancer biomarkers, the controversy surrounding their origin and biology, and most importantly the hurdles that remain to be overcome if they are really to become part of future clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBody FluidsExtracellular SpaceHumansRNA, NeoplasmRNA, UntranslatedTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorRNA, NeoplasmRNA, Untranslatedbiological fluidbiomarkermicroRNAncRNAnon-invasive

Identifiers

PMID26119132
PMCPMC4594673
OpenAlexW1620079123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.