Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26119129›Full record

Trial reportJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2016

Improving thermal dose accuracy in magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery: Long-term thermometry using a prior baseline as a reference.

Rachel R Bitton, Taylor D Webb, Kim Butts Pauly, Pejman Ghanouni

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Simultaneous proton resonance frequency TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. T2 mapping as a predictor of nonperfused volume in MRgFUS treatment of desmoid tumors.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel R BittonSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Taylor D WebbDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Kim Butts PaulySchool of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Pejman GhanouniSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

MRI Methods for Guiding Focused Ultrasound in the BrainP01CA159992 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PAULY, JOHN M. · 2011 to 2015
$8.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA159992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate thermal dose volume (TDV) and non-perfused volume (NPV) of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) treatments in patients with soft tissue tumors, and describe a method for MR thermal dosimetry using a baseline reference. MATERIALS AND

methodsAgreement between TDV and immediate post treatment NPV was evaluated from MRgFUS treatments of five patients with biopsy-proven desmoid tumors. Thermometry data (gradient echo, 3T) were analyzed over the entire course of the treatments to discern temperature errors in the standard approach. The technique searches previously acquired baseline images for a match using 2D normalized cross-correlation and a weighted mean of phase difference images. Thermal dose maps and TDVs were recalculated using the matched baseline and compared to NPV.

resultsTDV and NPV showed between 47%-91% disagreement, using the standard immediate baseline method for calculating TDV. Long-term thermometry showed a nonlinear local temperature accrual, where peak additional temperature varied between 4-13°C (mean = 7.8°C) across patients. The prior baseline method could be implemented by finding a previously acquired matching baseline 61% ± 8% (mean ± SD) of the time. We found 7%-42% of the disagreement between TDV and NPV was due to errors in thermometry caused by heat accrual. For all patients, the prior baseline method increased the estimated treatment volume and reduced the discrepancies between TDV and NPV (P = 0.023).

conclusionThis study presents a mismatch between in-treatment and post treatment efficacy measures. The prior baseline approach accounts for local heating and improves the accuracy of thermal dose-predicted volume.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDesmoid TumorsFemaleHigh-Energy Shock WavesHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHot TemperatureHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageRadiometryReference ValuesablationMR guided focused ultrasoundMR-HIFUnonperfused volumetemperature mappingthermal dosethermometry

Identifiers

PMID26119129
PMCPMC4691444
OpenAlexW1599381550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.