Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26119063›Full record

ReviewPsychology, health & medicine2016

A model of caregiver paediatric HIV disclosure decision-making.

Michael Evangeli, Ashraf Kagee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychology, health & medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael Evangelia Department of Psychology , Royal Holloway University of London , Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX , UK.
Ashraf Kageeb Department of Psychology , Stellenbosch University , Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 , South Africa.

Funding

The Global Partnership for AIDS Behavioral Research: South Africa and U.S.R24AA022919 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ROTHERAM-BORUS, MARY JANE · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
NIAAA NIH HHS R24 AA022919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many of the over 3 million HIV-positive children will only be told of their status as adolescents. Knowing one's status may increase treatment adherence, reduce onward HIV transmission, increase trust in caregivers and maximise available support. Yet deciding whether, what, how and when to tell HIV-positive children about their condition is challenging for caregivers. We systematically review HIV disclosure theories before presenting a process model of caregiver paediatric HIV disclosure decision-making. The model, consisting of both a pre-intention and a post-intention stage, integrates individual and contextual determinants. It aims to be situationally specific, broadly applicable and consistent with the empirical literature. Research and practice implications are discussed.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHIV InfectionsModels, PsychologicalTruth DisclosureCaregiversChildHumansIntentionPsychological Theorycaregiverdecision-makingHIVmodelpaediatric disclosure

Identifiers

PMID26119063
PMCPMC4940610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.