Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26118792›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Microbial population dynamics in response to Pectobacterium atrosepticum infection in potato tubers.

Viia Kõiv, Märt Roosaare, Eve Vedler, Paula Ann Kivistik, Kristel Toppi, David W Schryer, Maido Remm, Tanel Tenson, Andres Mäe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond kin killing:ISME communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Time-Course Responses of Apple Leaf Endophytes to the Infection ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Viia KõivInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, 23 Riia Street, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Märt RoosaareInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, 23 Riia Street, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Eve VedlerInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, 23 Riia Street, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Paula Ann KivistikEstonian Genome Center, University of Tartu, Riia 23 B, 51010 Tartu, Estonia.
Kristel ToppiInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, 23 Riia Street, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
David W SchryerInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, 1 Nooruse Street, Tartu 50411, Estonia.
Maido RemmInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, 23 Riia Street, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
Tanel TensonInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, 1 Nooruse Street, Tartu 50411, Estonia.
Andres MäeInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, 23 Riia Street, Tartu 51010, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endophytes are microbes and fungi that live inside plant tissues without damaging the host. Herein we examine the dynamic changes in the endophytic bacterial community in potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber in response to pathogenic infection by Pectobacterium atrosepticum, which causes soft rot in numerous economically important crops. We quantified community changes using both cultivation and next-generation sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and found that, despite observing significant variability in both the mass of macerated tissue and structure of the endophytic community between individual potato tubers, P. atrosepticum is always taken over by the endophytes during maceration. 16S rDNA sequencing revealed bacteria from the phyla Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Acidobacteria, TM7, and Deinococcus-Thermus. Prior to infection, Propionibacterium acnes is frequently among the dominant taxa, yet is out competed by relatively few dominant taxa as the infection proceeds. Two days post-infection, the most abundant sequences in macerated potato tissue are Gammaproteobacteria. The most dominant genera are Enterobacter and Pseudomonas. Eight days post-infection, the number of anaerobic pectolytic Clostridia increases, probably due to oxygen depletion. These results demonstrate that the pathogenesis is strictly initiated by the pathogen (sensu stricto) and proceeds with a major contribution from the endophytic community.

Indexed as

Base SequenceEndophytesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobiotaPectobacteriumPhenotypePhylogenyPlant TubersRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSolanum tuberosumRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26118792
PMCPMC4484245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.