Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26117802›Full record

ArticleAccident; analysis and prevention2015

Evaluating adverse rural crash outcomes using the NHTSA State Data System.

Christine Peura, Joseph A Kilch, David E Clark

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accident; analysis and prevention, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Urban-rural differences in the age of US physicians.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine PeuraCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA. Electronic address: peurac@mmc.org.
Joseph A KilchCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA. Electronic address: Joseph.Kilch@med.uvm.edu.
David E ClarkCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA; Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA. Electronic address: clarkd@mmc.org.
Maine Medical Center · USMaine Medical Center · US

Funding

County Trauma Systems and Outcomes DisparitiesR21HD061318 · NICHD · MAINEHEALTH · PI CLARK, DAVID E · 2009 to 2010
$412k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD061318NICHD NIH HHS R21HD061318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe population-based rate of motor vehicle crash mortality is consistently higher in rural locations, but it is unclear how much of this disparity might be due to geographic barriers or deficiencies in emergency medical services (EMS). We sought to analyze separately factors associated with the occurrence of a severe injury and those associated with death after injury had occurred.

methodsData from all police-reported crashes in 11 states from 2005-2007 were obtained through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) State Data System (SDS). Logistic regression was used to estimate factors associated with (1) death; (2) severe (incapacitating or fatal) injury; and (3) death given severe injury. Models included covariates related to the person, vehicle, and event; county location was specified using Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC).

resultsOlder age, not wearing a belt, ejection, alcohol involvement, high speed, and early morning times were associated with increased risk of both severe injury and death. Controlling for these factors, and restricting analysis to persons who had suffered a severe injury, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) associated with death was higher for counties classified rural (RUCC 6-7, aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.16-1.31) or very rural (RUCC 8-9, aOR 1.31, 95% CI 1.18-1.46).

conclusionsPersons severely injured in crashes are more likely to die if they are in rural locations, possibly due to EMS constraints. As NHTSA-SDS data become more available and more uniform, they may be useful to explore specific factors contributing to this increased risk.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAccidents, TrafficAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMaleCrashInjuryMortalityNHTSARuralState Data System

Identifiers

PMID26117802
PMCPMC4524451
OpenAlexW822824395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.