Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26117555›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2015

Can you party your way to better health? A propensity score analysis of block parties and health.

Lorraine T Dean, Amy Hillier, Hang Chau-Glendinning, S V Subramanian, David R Williams, Ichiro Kawachi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lorraine T DeanUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 909 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: ltdean@upenn.edu.
Amy HillierUniversity of Pennsylvania, School of Design, 102 Meyerson Hall, 210 South 34th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: ahillier@design.upenn.edu.
Hang Chau-GlendinningValley Medical Center, Department of Family Medicine, 3915 Talbot Rd South, Suite 401, Renton, WA 98055, USA. Electronic address: hchau39@gmail.com.
S V SubramanianHarvard School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7th Floor, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: svsubram@hsph.harvard.edu.
David R WilliamsHarvard School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 6th Floor, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: dwilliams@hsph.harvard.edu.
Ichiro KawachiHarvard School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7th Floor, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: ikawachi@hsph.harvard.edu.

Funding

Social Determinants of Breast Cancer SurvivorshipK01CA184288 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DEAN, LORRAINE TIERA · 2014 to 2018
$767k
Cancer prevention, mental health and social capital of segregated Black AmericansF31CA136236 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI DEAN, LORRAINE TIERA · 2008 to 2010
$41k
NCI NIH HHS 1F31CA136236NCI NIH HHS 1K01CA184288NCI NIH HHS F31 CA136236NCI NIH HHS K01 CA184288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While other indicators of social capital have been linked to health, the role of block parties on health in Black neighborhoods and on Black residents is understudied. Block parties exhibit several features of bonding social capital and are present in nearly 90% of Philadelphia's predominantly Black neighborhoods. This analysis investigated: (1) whether or not block parties are an indicator of bonding social capital in Black neighborhoods; (2) the degree to which block parties might be related to self-rated health in the ways that other bonding social indicators are related to health; and (3) whether or not block parties are associated with average self-rated health for Black residents particularly. Using census tract-level indicators of bonding social capital and records of block parties from 2003 to 2008 for 381 Philadelphia neighborhoods (defined by census tracts), an ecological-level propensity score was generated to assess the propensity for a block party, adjusting for population demographics, neighborhood characteristics, neighborhood resources and violent crime. Results indicate that in multivariable regression, block parties were associated with increased bonding social capital in Black neighborhoods; however, the calculation of the average effect of the treatment on the treated (ATT) within each propensity score strata showed no effect of block parties on average self-rated health for Black residents. Block parties may be an indicator of bonding social capital in Philadelphia's predominantly Black neighborhoods, but this analysis did not show a direct association between block parties and self-rated health for Black residents. Further research should consider what other health outcomes or behaviors block parties may be related to and how interventionists can leverage block parties for health promotion.

Indexed as

Health StatusLeisure ActivitiesObject AttachmentResidence CharacteristicsSocial CapitalBlack or African AmericanHumansInterpersonal RelationsPhiladelphiaPropensity ScoreSocial EnvironmentBlack/African-American neighborhoodsBlock partiesPennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPropensity scoreSelf-rated healthSocial capitalUSA

Identifiers

PMID26117555
PMCPMC4500646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.