Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26117540›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2015

Complementing tissue characterization by integrating transcriptome profiling from the Human Protein Atlas and from the FANTOM5 consortium.

Nancy Yiu-Lin Yu, Björn M Hallström, Linn Fagerberg, Fredrik Ponten, Hideya Kawaji, Piero Carninci, Alistair R R Forrest, Fantom Consortium, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, Mathias Uhlén and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Longitudinal big biological data in the AI era.Molecular systems biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Liver kinase B1 (LKB1) regulates the epigenetic landscape of mouse pancreatic beta cells.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The human protein atlas-Integrated omics for single cell mapping of the human proteome.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nancy Yiu-Lin YuDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, 14183, Sweden Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institute, Solna, 17121, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8321-8141
Björn M HallströmScience for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, 17121, Sweden.
Linn FagerbergScience for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, 17121, Sweden.
Fredrik PontenDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 751 85, Sweden.
Hideya KawajiRIKEN Preventive Medicine and Diagnosis Innovation Program, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Division of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Yokohama Institute, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, 230-0045, Japan RIKEN Omics Science Center1, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan.
Piero CarninciRIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Division of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Yokohama Institute, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, 230-0045, Japan RIKEN Omics Science Center1, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan.
Alistair R R ForrestRIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Division of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Yokohama Institute, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, 230-0045, Japan RIKEN Omics Science Center1, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan.
Fantom ConsortiumRIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Division of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Yokohama Institute, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, 230-0045, Japan RIKEN Omics Science Center1, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan.
Yoshihide HayashizakiRIKEN Preventive Medicine and Diagnosis Innovation Program, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan RIKEN Omics Science Center1, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan.
Mathias UhlénScience for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, 17121, Sweden.
Carsten O DaubDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, 14183, Sweden Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institute, Solna, 17121, Sweden RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies (CLST), Division of Genomic Technologies, RIKEN Yokohama Institute, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, 230-0045, Japan RIKEN Omics Science Center1, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan carsten.daub@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the normal state of human tissue transcriptome profiles is essential for recognizing tissue disease states and identifying disease markers. Recently, the Human Protein Atlas and the FANTOM5 consortium have each published extensive transcriptome data for human samples using Illumina-sequenced RNA-Seq and Heliscope-sequenced CAGE. Here, we report on the first large-scale complex tissue transcriptome comparison between full-length versus 5'-capped mRNA sequencing data. Overall gene expression correlation was high between the 22 corresponding tissues analyzed (R > 0.8). For genes ubiquitously expressed across all tissues, the two data sets showed high genome-wide correlation (91% agreement), with differences observed for a small number of individual genes indicating the need to update their gene models. Among the identified single-tissue enriched genes, up to 75% showed consensus of 7-fold enrichment in the same tissue in both methods, while another 17% exhibited multiple tissue enrichment and/or high expression variety in the other data set, likely dependent on the cell type proportions included in each tissue sample. Our results show that RNA-Seq and CAGE tissue transcriptome data sets are highly complementary for improving gene model annotations and highlight biological complexities within tissue transcriptomes. Furthermore, integration with image-based protein expression data is highly advantageous for understanding expression specificities for many genes.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHumansImmunohistochemistryMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteomeSequence Analysis, RNATissue DistributionProteome

Identifiers

PMID26117540
PMCPMC4538815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.