Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26117380›Full record

ArticleBMC international health and human rights2015

Understanding healthcare practices in superdiverse neighbourhoods and developing the concept of welfare bricolage: Protocol of a cross-national mixed-methods study.

Jenny Phillimore, Hannah Bradby, Michi Knecht, Beatriz Padilla, Tilman Brand, Sin Yi Cheung, Simon Pemberton, Hajo Zeeb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC international health and human rights, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jenny PhillimoreInstitute for Research into Superdiversity (IRiS), School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, Great Britain. j.a.phillimore@bham.ac.uk.
Hannah BradbyDepartment of Sociology, Uppsala University, Box 624, Se-751 26, Uppsala, Sweden. hannah.bradby@soc.uu.se.
Michi KnechtDepartment of Anthropology and Cultural Research, University of Bremen, Enrique-Schmidt-Straße 7, 28359, Bremen, Germany. knecht@uni-bremen.de.
Beatriz PadillaInterdisciplinary Centre of Social Sciences (CICS.NOVA), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal. beatriz.padilla@iscte.pt.
Tilman BrandLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS GmbH, Achterstraße 30, D-28359, Bremen, Germany. brand@bips.uni-bremen.de.
Sin Yi CheungSchool of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3W, Great Britain. CheungSY@cardiff.ac.uk.
Simon PembertonInstitute for Research into Superdiversity (IRiS), School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, Great Britain. s.pemberton@keele.ac.uk.
Hajo ZeebLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS GmbH, Achterstraße 30, D-28359, Bremen, Germany. zeeb@bips.uni-bremen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiversity in Europe has both increased and become more complex posing challenges to both national and local welfare state regimes. Evidence indicates specific barriers for migrant, faith and minority ethnic groups when accessing healthcare. However, previous studies of health in diverse cities in European countries have mainly adopted an ethno-national focus. Taking into account the new complexity of diversity within cities, a deeper and multi-faceted understanding of everyday health practices in superdiverse contexts is needed to support appropriate healthcare provision. METHODS/

designThis protocol describes a mixed method study investigating how residents in superdiverse neighbourhoods access healthcare. The study will include participant observation and qualitative interviewing as well as a standardised health survey and will be carried out in eight superdiverse neighbourhoods - with varying deprivations levels and trajectories of change - in four European countries (Germany, Portugal, Sweden and UK). In each neighbourhood, trained polylingual community researchers together with university researchers will map formal and informal provision and infrastructures supportive to health and healthcare. In-depth interviews with residents and healthcare providers in each country will investigate local health-supportive practices. Thematic analysis will be used to identify different types of help-seeking behaviours and support structures across neighbourhoods and countries. Using categories identified from analyses of interview material, a health survey will be set up investigating determinants of access to healthcare. Complex models, such as structural equation modelling, will be applied to analyse commonalities and differences between population groups, neighbourhoods and countries. DISCUSSION: This study offers the potential to contribute to a deeper understanding of how residents in superdiverse neighbourhoods deal with health and healthcare in everyday practices. The findings will inform governmental authorities, formal and informal healthcare providers how to further refine health services and how to achieve equitable access in diverse population groups.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityEthnicityHealth Services AccessibilityResidence CharacteristicsDelivery of Health CareEmigrants and ImmigrantsEuropeHumansInterviews as TopicPatient SatisfactionQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID26117380
PMCPMC4501194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.