Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26117249›Full record

Trial reportPsychiatry research2015

Factor structure of the autonomy preference index in people with severe mental illness.

Kelsey A Bonfils, Erin L Adams, Kim T Mueser, Jennifer L Wright-Berryman, Michelle P Salyers

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatry research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Understanding Autonomy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelsey A BonfilsPsychology Department, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Assertive Community Treatment Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States. Electronic address: kbonfils@iupui.edu.
Erin L AdamsPsychology Department, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Assertive Community Treatment Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Kim T MueserCenter for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.
Jennifer L Wright-BerrymanSchool of Social Work, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Michelle P SalyersPsychology Department, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Assertive Community Treatment Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Funding

A Pilot Test of CommonGround Based Shared Decision-MakingR34MH093563 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI SALYERS, MICHELLE P. · 2012 to 2014
$680k
Integrated Illness Management and Recovery of SMIR34MH074786 · NIMH · NH STATE DEPT/HLTH STATISTICS/DATA MGMT · PI RIERA, ERIK G · 2005 to 2007
$530k
NIMH NIH HHS 34MH093563NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH074786NIMH NIH HHS R34MH074786NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH093563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People vary in the amount of control they want to exercise over decisions about their healthcare. Given the importance of patient-centered care, accurate measurement of these autonomy preferences is critical. This study aimed to assess the factor structure of the Autonomy Preference Index (API), used widely in general healthcare, in individuals with severe mental illness. Data came from two studies of people with severe mental illness (N=293) who were receiving mental health and/or primary care/integrated care services. Autonomy preferences were assessed with the API regarding both psychiatric and primary care services. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate fit of the hypothesized two-factor structure of the API (decision-making autonomy and information-seeking autonomy). Results indicated the hypothesized structure for the API did not adequately fit the data for either psychiatric or primary care services. Three problematic items were dropped, resulting in adequate fit for both types of treatment. These results suggest that with relatively minor modifications the API has an acceptable factor structure when asking people with severe mental illness about their preferences to be involved in decision-making. The modified API has clinical and research utility for this population in the burgeoning field of autonomy in patient-centered healthcare.

Indexed as

Personal AutonomySeverity of Illness IndexAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareAutonomyConfirmatory factor analysisDecision-makingPatient-centered careSevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID26117249
PMCPMC4532554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.