Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26116674›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Development of Spatial Distribution Patterns by Biofilm Cells.

Janus A J Haagensen, Susse K Hansen, Bjarke B Christensen, Sünje J Pamp, Søren Molin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ZrOJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biofilm architecture: An emerging synthetic biology target.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Draft Genome Sequence ofGenome announcements · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janus A J HaagensenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Susse K HansenDepartment of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Bjarke B ChristensenDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Sünje J PampNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark sjpa@food.dtu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6236-1763
Søren MolinNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Hørsholm, Denmark Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Confined spatial patterns of microbial distribution are prevalent in nature, such as in microbial mats, soil communities, and water stream biofilms. The symbiotic two-species consortium of Pseudomonas putida and Acinetobacter sp. strain C6, originally isolated from a creosote-polluted aquifer, has evolved a distinct spatial organization in the laboratory that is characterized by an increased fitness and productivity. In this consortium, P. putida is reliant on microcolonies formed by Acinetobacter sp. C6, to which it attaches. Here we describe the processes that lead to the microcolony pattern by Acinetobacter sp. C6. Ecological spatial pattern analyses revealed that the microcolonies were not entirely randomly distributed and instead were arranged in a uniform pattern. Detailed time-lapse confocal microscopy at the single-cell level demonstrated that the spatial pattern was the result of an intriguing self-organization: small multicellular clusters moved along the surface to fuse with one another to form microcolonies. This active distribution capability was dependent on environmental factors (carbon source and oxygen) and historical contingency (formation of phenotypic variants). The findings of this study are discussed in the context of species distribution patterns observed in macroecology, and we summarize observations about the processes involved in coadaptation between P. putida and Acinetobacter sp. C6. Our results contribute to an understanding of spatial species distribution patterns as they are observed in nature, as well as the ecology of engineered communities that have the potential for enhanced and sustainable bioprocessing capacity.

Indexed as

Microbial ConsortiaAcinetobacterBiofilmsMicroscopy, ConfocalPseudomonas putidaTime-Lapse Imaging

Identifiers

PMID26116674
PMCPMC4542232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.