ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015
Development of Spatial Distribution Patterns by Biofilm Cells.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- ZrOJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Modeling Microbial Community Networks: Methods and Tools for Studying Microbial Interactions.Microbial ecology · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Rapid evolution destabilizes species interactions in a fluctuating environment.The ISME journal · 2021Article
- Animal development in the microbial world: Re-thinking the conceptual framework.Current topics in developmental biology · 2021Article
- Influence of interspecies interactions on the spatial organization of dual species bacterial communities.Biofilm · 2020Article
- Spatial organization in microbial range expansion emerges from trophic dependencies and successful lineages.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Biofilm architecture: An emerging synthetic biology target.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2020Review
- Synthetic microbial consortia for biosynthesis and biodegradation: promises and challenges.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2019Review
- Small-Scale Heterogeneity in Drinking Water Biofilms.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Should the biofilm mode of life be taken into consideration for microbial biocontrol agents?Microbial biotechnology · 2017Review
- Draft Genome Sequence ofGenome announcements · 2017Article
- Spatial Organization Plasticity as an Adaptive Driver of Surface Microbial Communities.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Confined spatial patterns of microbial distribution are prevalent in nature, such as in microbial mats, soil communities, and water stream biofilms. The symbiotic two-species consortium of Pseudomonas putida and Acinetobacter sp. strain C6, originally isolated from a creosote-polluted aquifer, has evolved a distinct spatial organization in the laboratory that is characterized by an increased fitness and productivity. In this consortium, P. putida is reliant on microcolonies formed by Acinetobacter sp. C6, to which it attaches. Here we describe the processes that lead to the microcolony pattern by Acinetobacter sp. C6. Ecological spatial pattern analyses revealed that the microcolonies were not entirely randomly distributed and instead were arranged in a uniform pattern. Detailed time-lapse confocal microscopy at the single-cell level demonstrated that the spatial pattern was the result of an intriguing self-organization: small multicellular clusters moved along the surface to fuse with one another to form microcolonies. This active distribution capability was dependent on environmental factors (carbon source and oxygen) and historical contingency (formation of phenotypic variants). The findings of this study are discussed in the context of species distribution patterns observed in macroecology, and we summarize observations about the processes involved in coadaptation between P. putida and Acinetobacter sp. C6. Our results contribute to an understanding of spatial species distribution patterns as they are observed in nature, as well as the ecology of engineered communities that have the potential for enhanced and sustainable bioprocessing capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.