Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26116651›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2015

Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Improving Education Outside of Transplant Centers about Live Donor Transplantation--Recommendations from a Consensus Conference.

Amy D Waterman, Marie Morgievich, David J Cohen, Zeeshan Butt, Harini A Chakkera, Carrie Lindower, Rebecca E Hays, Janet M Hiller, Krista L Lentine, Arthur J Matas and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Time trends in preemptive kidney transplantation in Europe: an ERA registry study.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy D WatermanDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material. awaterman@mednet.ucla.edu.
Marie MorgievichDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
David J CohenDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Zeeshan ButtDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Harini A ChakkeraDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Carrie LindowerDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Rebecca E HaysDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Janet M HillerDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Krista L LentineDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Arthur J MatasDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Emilio D PoggioDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Michael A ReesDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
James R RodrigueDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
Dianne LaPointe RudowDue to the number of contributing authors,the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material.
American Society of Transplantation
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Kidney Donor Outcomes Cohort (KDOC) StudyR01DK085185 · NIDDK · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MANDELBROT, DIDIER A, RODRIGUE, JAMES R · 2011 to 2014
$2.8M
A Randomized Trial and Reduce to Disparity in Live Donor Kidney TransplantationR01DK079665 · NIDDK · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI RODRIGUE, JAMES R · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1-TR000124NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079665NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK079665NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085185NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK085185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) offers better quality of life and clinical outcomes, including patient survival, compared with remaining on dialysis or receiving a deceased donor kidney transplant. Although LDKT education within transplant centers for both potential recipients and living donors is very important, outreach and education to kidney patients in settings other than transplant centers and to the general public is also critical to increase access to this highly beneficial treatment. In June 2014, the American Society of Transplantation's Live Donor Community of Practice, with the support of 10 additional sponsors, convened a consensus conference to determine best practices in LDKT, including a workgroup focused on developing a set of recommendations for optimizing outreach and LDKT education outside of transplant centers. Members of this workgroup performed a structured literature review, conducted teleconference meetings, and met in person at the 2-day conference. Their efforts resulted in consensus around the following recommendations. First, preemptive transplantation should be promoted through increased LDKT education by primary care physicians and community nephrologists. Second, dialysis providers should be trained to educate their own patients about LDKT and deceased donor kidney transplantation. Third, partnerships between community organizations, organ procurement organizations, religious organizations, and transplant centers should be fostered to support transplantation. Fourth, use of technology should be improved or expanded to better educate kidney patients and their support networks. Fifth, LDKT education and outreach should be improved for kidney patients in rural areas. Finally, a consensus-driven, evidence-based public message about LDKT should be developed. Discussion of the effect and potential for implementation around each recommendation is featured, particularly regarding reducing racial and socioeconomic disparities in access to LDKT. To accomplish these recommendations, the entire community of professionals and organizations serving kidney patients must work collaboratively toward ensuring accurate, comprehensive, and up-to-date LDKT education for all patients, thereby reducing barriers to LDKT access and increasing LDKT rates.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesConsensusCooperative BehaviorHumansKidney TransplantationLiving DonorsNephrologyOrganizationsPatient Education as TopicRenal DialysisRural Health ServicesTransplant Recipientsconsensus conferencelive donor kidney transplantationoutreachpatient educationrecommendations

Identifiers

PMID26116651
PMCPMC4559502
OpenAlexW2116822162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.