Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26116076›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2016

Cdc14 phosphatase: warning, no delay allowed for chromosome segregation!

Félix Machín, Oliver Quevedo, Cristina Ramos-Pérez, Jonay García-Luis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Yeast Mitotic Tale for the Nucleus and the Vacuoles to Embrace.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hog1 activation delays mitotic exit via phosphorylation of Net1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Characterization of aBiology open · 2018
    Article
  14. O Cdc7 kinase where art thou?Current genetics · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Félix MachínUnidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Ctra del Rosario 145, 38010, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. fmacconw@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4559-7798
Oliver QuevedoUnidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Ctra del Rosario 145, 38010, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Cristina Ramos-PérezUnidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Ctra del Rosario 145, 38010, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Jonay García-LuisUnidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Ctra del Rosario 145, 38010, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria · ESUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cycling events in nature start and end to restart again and again. In the cell cycle, whose purpose is to become two where there was only one, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are the beginning and, therefore, phosphatases must play a role in the ending. Since CDKs are drivers of the cell cycle and cancer cells uncontrollably divide, much attention has been put into knocking down CDK activity. However, much less is known on the consequences of interfering with the phosphatases that put an end to the cell cycle. We have addressed in recent years the consequences of transiently inactivating the only master cell cycle phosphatase in the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cdc14. Transient inactivation is expected to better mimic the pharmacological action of drugs. Interestingly, we have found that yeast cells tolerate badly a relatively brief inactivation of Cdc14 when cells are already committed into anaphase, the first cell cycle stage where this phosphatase plays important roles. First, we noticed that the segregation of distal regions in the chromosome arm that carries the ribosomal DNA array was irreversibly impaired, leading to an anaphase bridge (AB). Next, we found that this AB could eventually be severed by cytokinesis and led to two different types of genetically compromised daughter cells. All these previous studies were done in haploid cells. We have now recently expanded this analysis to diploid cells and used the advantage of making hybrid diploids to study chromosome rearrangements and changes in the ploidy of the surviving progeny. We have found that the consequences for the genome integrity were far more dramatic than originally envisioned.

Indexed as

AnaphaseCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsChromosome SegregationChromosomes, FungalMitosisProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSister Chromatid ExchangeCDC14 protein, S cerevisiaeCell Cycle ProteinsProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAnaphase bridgesAneuploidyCdc14Gross chromosomal rearrangementsrDNASaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID26116076
PMCPMC4723626
OpenAlexW778660520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.