Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26116028›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2015

Freshwater Planarians as an Alternative Animal Model for Neurotoxicology.

Danielle Hagstrom, Olivier Cochet-Escartin, Siqi Zhang, Cindy Khuu, Eva-Maria S Collins

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advances in ecotoxicological research using planarians: a comprehensive review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Review
  6. Rapid behavioral screening in the planarianFrontiers in toxicology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Statistical analysis of multi-endpoint phenotypic screening increases sensitivity of planarian neurotoxicity testing.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the potential ofCurrent research in toxicology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle Hagstrom*Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093;
Olivier Cochet-EscartinPhysics Department, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093; and.
Siqi ZhangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093.
Cindy Khuu*Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093;
Eva-Maria S Collins*Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093; Physics Department, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093; and emscollins@physics.ucsd.edu.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

GENETIC MECHANISMS AND REGULATIONT32GM007240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAMPTON, RANDOLPH Y. · 1985 to 2019
$23.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5T32GM007240-37NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional toxicology testing has relied on low-throughput, expensive mammalian studies; however, timely testing of the large number of environmental toxicants requires new in vitro and in vivo platforms for inexpensive medium- to high-throughput screening. Herein, we describe the suitability of the asexual freshwater planarian Dugesia japonica as a new animal model for the study of developmental neurotoxicology. As these asexual animals reproduce by binary fission, followed by regeneration of missing body structures within approximately 1 week, development and regeneration occur through similar processes allowing us to induce neurodevelopment "at will" through amputation. This short time scale and the comparable sizes of full and regenerating animals enable parallel experiments in adults and developing worms to determine development-specific aspects of toxicity. Because the planarian brain, despite its simplicity, is structurally and molecularly similar to the mammalian brain, we are able to ascertain neurodevelopmental toxicity that is relevant to humans. As a proof of concept, we developed a 5-step semiautomatic screening platform to characterize the toxicity of 9 known neurotoxicants (consisting of common solvents, pesticides, and detergents) and a neutral agent, glucose, and quantified effects on viability, stimulated and unstimulated behavior, regeneration, and brain structure. Comparisons of our findings with other alternative toxicology animal models, such as zebrafish larvae and nematodes, demonstrated that planarians are comparably sensitive to the tested chemicals. In addition, we found that certain compounds induced adverse effects specifically in developing animals. We thus conclude that planarians offer new complementary opportunities for developmental neurotoxicology animal models.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesBehavior, AnimalBrainDisease Models, AnimalGlucoseLethal Dose 50Neurotoxicity SyndromesNeurotoxinsPlanariansRegenerationReproduction, AsexualThermosensingGlucoseNeurotoxinsaquatic toxicologybehaviordevelopmental neurotoxicityplanarianscreening

Identifiers

PMID26116028
PMCPMC4838007
OpenAlexW1891921804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.