Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26115865›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2015

From the left to the right: 13-year experience in laparoscopic living donor liver transplantation.

Raffaele Brustia, Shohei Komatsu, Claire Goumard, Denis Bernard, Olivier Soubrane, Olivier Scatton

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raffaele BrustiaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France, raffaele.brustia@gmail.com.
Shohei Komatsu
Claire Goumard
Denis Bernard
Olivier Soubrane
Olivier Scatton
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living Donors are the best theoretical candidates to benefit from the advantages of laparoscopy, but development was slow because of concerns about graft integrity and donor safety. Herein our 13-year experience in laparoscopic Living Donor Liver Transplantation (LDLT) is presented. Laparoscopic Left Lateral Section (LLLS) was performed in children receiver, while Laparoscopic Left Hepatectomy (LLH)-including or not the middle hepatic vein-and Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy (LRH) in adults. Two senior surgeons were always involved for each procedure. All donors were first-degree relatives. From 2001 to 2014, 71 procedures were performed: 63 LLLS (88.7%, 6 LLH (8.4%), and 2 LRH (2.8%). Surgical procedures required a mean of 271.1 ± 65.9, 318 ± 40.2, and 480 ± 0 min for LLLS, LLH, and LRH, respectively with a learning curve toward LLLH over the years (r = 0.09). Seven procedures (9.8%) required conversion. The mean hospital stay was 5.5 ± 3.4, 5.3 ± 0.6, and 8 ± 0 days for LLLS, LLH, and LRH, respectively. Complications occurred in 11 patients (17.3%) undergoing LLLS: 8 (12.7%) grade I and 3 (4.7%) grade II, according to the Modified Clavien-Dindo classification. Laparoscopic liver resection for LDLT requires an equivalent and parallel expertise in open LDLT and LLR. If LLLS for LDLT is now in an exploration phase in highly specialized centers, LLH and LRH for LDLT in adults lack evidence and cannot be recommended for wide introduction. For laparoscopic LDLT beginners, LLLS offers optimal conditions.

Indexed as

Living DonorsPatient SafetyAdultBlood Loss, SurgicalCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHepatectomyHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID26115865
OpenAlexW854648555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.