Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2015
Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 9 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 813 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized, Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma (KEYNOTE 002)
A Phase I, Open Label, Single Center and Dose Escalation Study Investigating Tolerance and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Doses of Recombinant Humanized Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody for Injection in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
A Phase I,Open,Mono-center and Dose Escalation Study Investigating Tolerance and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Doses of Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody in Patients With Triple-negative Breast Cancer
An Observational Study Design to Detect if Co-stimulatory Markers and Vitamin D Status in Anti-PD-1 Treated Advanced Melanoma Patients Can Predict Treatment Outcome
Phase II Study to Test Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in First Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC Patients With PD-L1 Low Tumors (<50%)_ PEOPLE TRIAL (Pembrolizumab in Pd-L1 Low Expressors).
A Pilot Study of Blinatumomab in Combination With a PD1 Inhibitor, Pembrolizumab, in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Relapsed/Refractory CD19 Positive B-cell Acute Leukemia or Lymphoma
NIVOLUMAB Plus IPILIMUMAB and TEMOZOLOMIDE in Combination in Microsatellite Stable (MSS), MGMT Silenced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): the MAYA Study
An Exploratory Study of Sorafenib Plus Toripalimab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus
Pilot Study to Test the Feasibility of IV Injected Tc-99m-tilmanocept for Imaging of M2-like Tumour Associated Macrophages in Metastatic Melanoma
Who cites it
813 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Islet function impairment outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Targeted and Immune Combination Therapy in Advanced Melanoma-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge in advanced solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in randomized clinical trials testing immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of melanoma, version 3.0.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023Guideline
- Complete remissions following immunotherapy or immuno-oncology combinations in cancer patients: the MOUSEION-03 meta-analysis.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2023Pooled it
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors related respiratory disorders in patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Targeted Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment: A New Era Ahead-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.ESMO open · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of open-label versus blinded study design on patient-reported outcomes data in randomized clinical trials of immunotherapy in advanced or metastatic cancer patients: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022Pooled it
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Patients With Cancer and Preexisting Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Programmed Cell Death 1 and Programmed Death Ligand-1 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- MONETTE: A Randomized Phase II Study of Ceralasertib plus Durvalumab or Ceralasertib Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Melanoma Resistant to PD-(L)1 Inhibition.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Trial
- Nemvaleukin alfa monotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase 1/2 non-randomized ARTISTRY-1 trial.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Five-Year Follow-Up of POLARIS-01 Phase II Trial: Toripalimab as Salvage Monotherapy in Chinese Patients With Advanced Melanoma.The oncologist · 2024Trial
- A phase II study of retifanlimab, a humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with solid tumors (POD1UM-203).ESMO open · 2024Trial
- A phase II study of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin in BRCA-related metastatic breast cancer (PEMBRACA).ESMO open · 2023Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib in Patients with Recurrent or Refractory Melanoma.The oncologist · 2022Trial
- A Bayesian phase I/II biomarker-based design for identifying subgroup-specific optimal dose for immunotherapy.Statistical methods in medical research · 2022Trial
753 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with melanoma that progresses on ipilimumab and, if BRAF(V600) mutant-positive, a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both, have few treatment options. We assessed the efficacy and safety of two pembrolizumab doses versus investigator-choice chemotherapy in patients with ipilimumab-refractory melanoma.
methodsWe carried out a randomised phase 2 trial of patients aged 18 years or older from 73 hospitals, clinics, and academic medical centres in 12 countries who had confirmed progressive disease within 24 weeks after two or more ipilimumab doses and, if BRAF(V600) mutant-positive, previous treatment with a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both. Patients had to have resolution of all ipilimumab-related adverse events to grade 0-1 and prednisone 10 mg/day or less for at least 2 weeks, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and at least one measurable lesion to be eligible. Using a centralised interactive voice response system, we randomly assigned (1:1:1) patients in a block size of six to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks or investigator-choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, dacarbazine, or oral temozolomide). Randomisation was stratified by ECOG performance status, lactate dehydrogenase concentration, and BRAF(V600) mutation status. Individual treatment assignment between pembrolizumab and chemotherapy was open label, but investigators and patients were masked to assignment of the dose of pembrolizumab. We present the primary endpoint at the prespecified second interim analysis of progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01704287. The study is closed to enrolment but continues to follow up and treat patients.
findingsBetween Nov 30, 2012, and Nov 13, 2013, we enrolled 540 patients: 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg, 181 to receive pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg, and 179 to receive chemotherapy. Based on 410 progression-free survival events, progression-free survival was improved in patients assigned to pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg (HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·45-0·73; p<0·0001) and those assigned to pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg (0·50, 0·39-0·64; p<0·0001) compared with those assigned to chemotherapy. 6-month progression-free survival was 34% (95% CI 27-41) in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 38% (31-45) in the 10 mg/kg group, and 16% (10-22) in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 20 (11%) patients in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 25 (14%) in the pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg group, and 45 (26%) in the chemotherapy group. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse event in the pembrolizumab groups was fatigue (two [1%] of 178 patients in the 2 mg/kg group and one [<1%] of 179 patients in the 10 mg/kg group, compared with eight [5%] of 171 in the chemotherapy group). Other treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events include generalised oedema and myalgia (each in two [1%] patients) in those given pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg; hypopituitarism, colitis, diarrhoea, decreased appetite, hyponatremia, and pneumonitis (each in two [1%]) in those given pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg; and anaemia (nine [5%]), fatigue (eight [5%]), neutropenia (six [4%]), and leucopenia (six [4%]) in those assigned to chemotherapy.
interpretationThese findings establish pembrolizumab as a new standard of care for the treatment of ipilimumab-refractory melanoma.
fundingMerck Sharp & Dohme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.