Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26115677›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2015

Intrinsic signature of essential tremor in the cerebello-frontal network.

Cécile Gallea, Traian Popa, Daniel García-Lorenzo, Romain Valabregue, André-Pierre Legrand, Lea Marais, Bertrand Degos, Cecile Hubsch, Sara Fernández-Vidal, Eric Bardinet and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04074031 (Transcranial Ultrasound Therapy of Essential Tremor), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04074031 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Transcranial Ultrasound Therapy of Essential Tremor

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2020 to 2024Enrolled15ConditionsEssential TremorArmsTranscranial Ultrasound Therapy (Exablate® 4000 Type 1.1)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. No reliable gray matter changes in essential tremor.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Prospective Home-use Study on Non-invasive Neuromodulation Therapy for Essential Tremor.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Trial
  9. Orthostatic tremor: a cerebellar pathology?Brain : a journal of neurology · 2016
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phenotypical Differentiation of Tremor Using Time Series Feature Extraction and Machine Learning.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Pathophysiological Role of Primary Motor Cortex in Essential Tremor.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Cécile Gallea1 Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche - Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Paris, France 2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France cecile.gallea.icm@gmail.com.
Traian Popa1 Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche - Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Paris, France 2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France.
Daniel García-Lorenzo1 Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche - Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Paris, France 2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France.
Romain Valabregue1 Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche - Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Paris, France 2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France.
André-Pierre Legrand5 ESPCI, Paris Sciences, Paris, France.
Lea Marais1 Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche - Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Paris, France 2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France.
Bertrand Degos2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France 6 AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Neurologie, Paris, France.
Cecile Hubsch2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France 6 AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Neurologie, Paris, France.
Sara Fernández-Vidal1 Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche - Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Paris, France 2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France.
Eric Bardinet1 Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche - Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Paris, France 2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France.
Emmanuel Roze2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France 6 AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Neurologie, Paris, France.
Stéphane Lehéricy1 Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche - Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Paris, France 2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France 7 AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Neuroradiologie, Paris, France.
Marie Vidailhet2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France 6 AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Département de Neurologie, Paris, France.
Sabine Meunier2 Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, Paris, France 3 CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France 4 Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut du Cerveau · FRSorbonne Université · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRESPCI Paris · FRPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Essential tremor is a movement disorder characterized by tremor during voluntary movements, mainly affecting the upper limbs. The cerebellum and its connections to the cortex are known to be involved in essential tremor, but no task-free intrinsic signatures of tremor related to structural cerebellar defects have so far been found in the cortical motor network. Here we used voxel-based morphometry, tractography and resting-state functional MRI at 3 T to compare structural and functional features in 19 patients with essential tremor and homogeneous symptoms in the upper limbs, and 19 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers. Both structural and functional abnormalities were found in the patients' cerebellum and supplementary motor area. Relative to the healthy controls, the essential tremor patients' cerebellum exhibited less grey matter in lobule VIII and less effective connectivity between each cerebellar cortex and the ipsilateral dentate nucleus. The patient's supplementary motor area exhibited (i) more grey matter; (ii) a lower amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation of the blood oxygenation level-dependent signal; (iii) less effective connectivity between each supplementary motor area and the ipsilateral primary motor hand area, and (iv) a higher probability of connection between supplementary motor area fibres and the spinal cord. Structural and functional changes in the supplementary motor area, but not in the cerebellum, correlated with clinical severity. In addition, changes in the cerebellum and supplementary motor area were interrelated, as shown by a correlation between the lower amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation in the supplementary motor area and grey matter loss in the cerebellum. The structural and functional changes observed in the supplementary motor area might thus be a direct consequence of cerebellar defects: the supplementary motor area would attempt to reduce tremor in the motor output by reducing its communication with M1 hand areas and by directly modulating motor output via its corticospinal projections.See Raethjen and Muthuraman (doi:10.1093/brain/awv238) for a scientific commentary on this article.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCerebellumEssential TremorFemaleFrontal LobeHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysOxygenRestSeverity of Illness IndexOxygencerebellar functionfrontal lobemotor cortexmovement disorder: imagingtremor

Identifiers

PMID26115677
PMCPMC4747645
OpenAlexW2154936861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.