Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26115674›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2015

Neurorestoration after traumatic brain injury through angiotensin II receptor blockage.

Sonia Villapol, María G Balarezo, Kwame Affram, Juan M Saavedra, Aviva J Symes

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ang II-mediated effects on BBB integrity in psychiatric and neurological disorders.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  5. Targeting ATScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sonia Villapol1 Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA 2 Department of Pharmacology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA *Present address: Georgetown University Medical Centre, Department of Neuroscience, Washington, DC, USA sonia.villapol@georgetown.edu.
María G Balarezo2 Department of Pharmacology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kwame Affram2 Department of Pharmacology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Juan M Saavedra3 Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Aviva J Symes1 Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA 2 Department of Pharmacology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS MH 002762-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

See Moon (doi:10.1093/awv239) for a scientific commentary on this article.Traumatic brain injury frequently leads to long-term cognitive problems and physical disability yet remains without effective therapeutics. Traumatic brain injury results in neuronal injury and death, acute and prolonged inflammation and decreased blood flow. Drugs that block angiotensin II type 1 receptors (AT1R, encoded by AGTR1) (ARBs or sartans) are strongly neuroprotective, neurorestorative and anti-inflammatory. To test whether these drugs may be effective in treating traumatic brain injury, we selected two sartans, candesartan and telmisartan, of proven therapeutic efficacy in animal models of brain inflammation, neurodegenerative disorders and stroke. Using a validated mouse model of controlled cortical impact injury, we determined effective doses for candesartan and telmisartan, their therapeutic window, mechanisms of action and effect on cognition and motor performance. Both candesartan and telmisartan ameliorated controlled cortical impact-induced injury with a therapeutic window up to 6 h at doses that did not affect blood pressure. Both drugs decreased lesion volume, neuronal injury and apoptosis, astrogliosis, microglial activation, pro-inflammatory signalling, and protected cerebral blood flow, when determined 1 to 3 days post-injury. Controlled cortical impact-induced cognitive impairment was ameliorated 30 days after injury only by candesartan. The neurorestorative effects of candesartan and telmisartan were reduced by concomitant administration of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ, encoded by PPARG) antagonist T0070907, showing the importance of PPARγ activation for the neurorestorative effect of these sartans. AT1R knockout mice were less vulnerable to controlled cortical impact-induced injury suggesting that the sartan's blockade of the AT1R also contributes to their efficacy. This study strongly suggests that sartans with dual AT1R blocking and PPARγ activating properties have therapeutic potential for traumatic brain injury.

Indexed as

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAnimalsApoptosisBenzamidesBenzimidazolesBenzoatesBiphenyl CompoundsBrain InjuriesCerebrovascular CirculationGliosisInflammationMiceMice, KnockoutMicrogliaNeuronsNeuroprotective AgentsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersBenzamidesBenzimidazolesBenzoatesBiphenyl CompoundscandesartanNeuroprotective AgentsPPAR gammaPyridinesReceptor, Angiotensin, Type 1T 0070907TelmisartanTetrazolesapoptosiscandesartaninflammationrecoverytelmisartan

Identifiers

PMID26115674
PMCPMC4731413
OpenAlexW1892097089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.