Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26115430›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Genetic Changes to a Transcriptional Silencer Element Confers Phenotypic Diversity within and between Drosophila Species.

Winslow C Johnson, Alison J Ordway, Masayoshi Watada, Jonathan N Pruitt, Thomas M Williams, Mark Rebeiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The rewiring of transcription circuits in evolution.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Winslow C JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Alison J OrdwayDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Masayoshi WatadaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan.
Jonathan N PruittDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Thomas M WilliamsDepartment of Biology, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio, United States of America.
Mark RebeizDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modification of transcriptional regulation has become increasingly appreciated as a major contributor to morphological evolution. However, the role of negative-acting control elements (e.g. silencers) in generating morphological diversity has been generally overlooked relative to positive-acting "enhancer" elements. The highly variable body coloration patterns among Drosophilid insects represents a powerful model system in which the molecular alterations that underlie phenotypic diversity can be defined. In a survey of pigment phenotypes among geographically disparate Japanese populations of Drosophila auraria, we discovered a remarkable degree of variation in male-specific abdominal coloration. In testing the expression patterns of the major pigment-producing enzymes, we found that phenotypes uniquely correlated with differences in the expression of ebony, a gene required for yellow-colored cuticle. Assays of ebony's transcriptional control region indicated that a lightly pigmented strain harbored cis-regulatory mutations that caused correlated changes in its expression. Through a series of chimeric reporter constructs between light and dark strain alleles, we localized function-altering mutations to a conserved silencer that mediates a male-specific pattern of ebony repression. This suggests that the light allele was derived through the loss of this silencer's activity. Furthermore, examination of the ebony gene of D. serrata, a close relative of D. auraria which secondarily lost male-specific pigmentation revealed the parallel loss of this silencer element. These results demonstrate how loss-of-function mutations in a silencer element resulted in increased gene expression. We propose that the mutational inactivation of silencer elements may represent a favored path to evolve gene expression, impacting morphological traits.

Indexed as

Silencer Elements, TranscriptionalAllelesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBase SequenceConserved SequenceDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression RegulationJapanMaleMutationPhenotypePigmentationSpecies SpecificityDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinse protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID26115430
PMCPMC4483262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.