Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26115172›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

The Importance of Integration of Stakeholder Views in Core Outcome Set Development: Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Cleft Palate.

Nicola L Harman, Iain A Bruce, Jamie J Kirkham, Stephanie Tierney, Peter Callery, Kevin O'Brien, Alex M D Bennett, Raouf Chorbachi, Per N Hall, Anne Harding-Bell and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
45.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola L HarmanMRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Iain A BruceCentral Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Jamie J KirkhamMRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Stephanie TierneyRoyal College of Nursing Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom.
Peter CallerySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Kevin O'BrienThe Healing Foundation Cleft and Craniofacial Clinical Research Centre, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Alex M D BennettNHS Lothian, ENT Department, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Raouf ChorbachiNorth Thames Cleft Service and the Department of Audiological Medicine/ Audiology/Cochlear implants. Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom.
Per N HallCleft Net East, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Anne Harding-BellCleft Net East, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Victoria H ParfectCleft Net East, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nichola RumseyCentre for Appearance Research, Department of Health & Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Debbie SellNorth Thames Cleft Service, Speech and Language Therapy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom.
Ravi SharmaNorth West, Isle of Man and North Wales Cleft Lip and Palate Network, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Paula R WilliamsonMRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBNHS Lothian · GBRoyal Manchester Children's Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of the West of England · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800792Medical Research Council MR/K025635/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 75% of children with cleft palate (CP) have Otitis Media with Effusion (OME) histories. Evidence for the effective management of OME in these children is lacking. The inconsistency in outcome measurement in previous studies has led to a call for the development of a Core Outcome Set (COS). Despite the increase in the number of published COS, involvement of patients in the COS development process, and methods to integrate the views of patients and health professionals, to date have been limited. METHODS AND

findingsA list of outcomes measured in previous research was identified through reviewing the literature. Opinion on the importance of each of these outcomes was then sought from key stakeholders: Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) surgeons, audiologists, cleft surgeons, speech and language therapists, specialist cleft nurses, psychologists, parents and children. The opinion of health professionals was sought in a three round Delphi survey where participants were asked to score each outcome using a bespoke online system. Parents and children were also asked to score outcomes in a survey and provided an in-depth insight into having OME through semi-structured interviews. The results of the Delphi survey, interviews and parent/patient survey were brought together in a final consensus meeting with representation from all stakeholders. A final set of eleven outcomes reached the definition of "consensus in" to form the recommended COS: hearing; chronic otitis media (COM); OME; receptive language skills; speech development; psycho social development; acute otitis media (AOM); cholesteatoma; side effects of treatment; listening skills; otalgia.

conclusionsWe have produced a recommendation about the outcomes that should be measured, as a minimum, in studies of the management of OME in children with CP. The development process included input from key stakeholders and used novel methodology to integrate the opinion of healthcare professionals, parents and children.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolCleft PalateConsensusDisease ManagementHealth OccupationsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOtitis Media with EffusionOutcome Assessment, Health CareParentsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26115172
PMCPMC4483230
OpenAlexW2164292972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.