Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26115146›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015

Mobile phone-based interventions for improving contraception use.

Chris Smith, Judy Gold, Thoai D Ngo, Colin Sumpter, Caroline Free

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03612518 (An mHealth, Multi-Centre Randomized Controlled Trial to Promote Use of Postpartum Contraception Amongst Rural Women in Punjab, Pakistan), which is not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03612518 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

An mHealth, Multi-Centre Randomized Controlled Trial to Promote Use of Postpartum Contraception Amongst Rural Women in Punjab, Pakistan

TypeinterventionalSponsorJunaid-ur-Rehman SiddiquiRan2018 to 2019Enrolled970ConditionsContraception BehaviorArmsText and Voice Messages, Interactive Phone Call
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mobile phone-based interventions for improving contraception use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2019
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Family Planning Reminder Systems: An Updated Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  15. Atencion primaria · 2018
    Guideline
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chris SmithClinical Trials Unit, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Judy Gold
Thoai D Ngo
Colin Sumpter
Caroline Free

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContraception provides significant benefits for women's and children's health, yet an estimated 225 million women had an unmet need for modern contraceptive methods in 2014. Interventions delivered by mobile phone have been demonstrated to be effective in other health areas, but their effects on use of contraception have not been established.

objectivesTo assess the effects of mobile phone-based interventions for improving contraception use. SEARCH

methodsWe searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of client-provider interventions delivered by mobile phone to improve contraception use compared with standard care or another intervention. We searched the electronic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, PsycINFO, POPLINE, Africa-Wide Information and Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) from January 1993 to October 2014, as well as clinical trials registries, online mHealth resources and abstracts from key conferences. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of mobile phone-based interventions to improve any form of contraception use amongst users or potential users of contraception. Outcome measures included uptake of contraception, measures of adherence, pregnancy and abortion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts of studies retrieved using the search strategy and extracted data from the included studies. We calculated the Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, together with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Differences in interventions and outcome measures did not permit us to undertake meta-analysis. MAIN

resultsFive RCTs met our inclusion criteria. Three trials aimed to improve adherence to a specific method of contraception amongst existing or new contraception users by comparing automated text message interventions versus standard care. Two trials aimed to improve both uptake and adherence, not limited to one method, in both users and non-users of contraception. No trials were at low risk of bias in all areas assessed.One trial in the USA reported improved self reported oral contraceptive (OC) continuation at six months from an intervention comprising a range of uni-directional and interactive text messages (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.35). One trial in Cambodia reported increased self reported use of effective contraception at four months post abortion from an intervention comprising automated interactive voice messages and phone counsellor support (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.66).One feasibility trial in the USA reported a lower mean number of days between scheduled and completed attendance for the first but not subsequent Depo-Provera appointments using clinic records from an intervention comprising reminders and healthy self management text messages (mean difference (MD) -8.60 days, 95% CI -16.74 to -0.46). Simple text message OC reminders had no effect on missed pills as assessed by electronic medication monitoring in a small trial in the USA (MD 0.5 missed pills, 95% CI -1.08 to 2.08). No effect on self reported contraception use was noted amongst isotretinoin users from an intervention that provided health information via two uni-directional text messages and mail (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.89). One trial assessed potential adverse effects of the intervention and reported no evidence of road traffic accidents or domestic abuse. AUTHORS'

conclusionsOur review provides limited evidence that interventions delivered by mobile phone can improve contraception use. Whilst evidence suggests that a series of interactive voice messages and counsellor support can improve post-abortion contraception, and that a mixture of uni-directional and interactive daily educational text messages can improve OC adherence, the cost-effectiveness and long-term effects of these interventions remain unknown. Further high-quality trials are required to robustly establish the effects of interventions delivered by mobile phone to improve contraception use.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneContraception BehaviorAbortion ApplicantsContraceptionContraceptives, OralFemaleHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReminder SystemsText MessagingContraceptives, Oral

Identifiers

PMID26115146
PMCPMC6485989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.