Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26115087›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2015

Are You Sure? Confidence about the Satiating Capacity of a Food Affects Subsequent Food Intake.

Helgi B Schiöth, Danielle Ferriday, Sarah R Davies, Christian Benedict, Helena Elmståhl, Jeffrey M Brunstrom, Pleunie S Hogenkamp

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Helgi B SchiöthDepartment of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 24, Sweden. helgi.schioth@neuro.uu.se.
Danielle FerridayNutrition and Behaviour Unit, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK. Danielle.Ferriday@bristol.ac.uk.
Sarah R DaviesNutrition and Behaviour Unit, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK. sarah.r.davies@bristol.ac.uk.
Christian BenedictDepartment of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 24, Sweden. Christian.benedict@neuro.uu.se.
Helena ElmståhlDepartment of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 24, Sweden. helena.elmstahl@ikv.uu.se.
Jeffrey M BrunstromNutrition and Behaviour Unit, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK. Jeff.Brunstrom@bristol.ac.uk.
Pleunie S HogenkampDepartment of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-751 24, Sweden. pleunie.hogenkamp@neuro.uu.se.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I012370/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expectations about a food's satiating capacity predict self-selected portion size, food intake and food choice. However, two individuals might have a similar expectation, but one might be extremely confident while the other might be guessing. It is unclear whether confidence about an expectation affects adjustments in energy intake at a subsequent meal. In a randomized cross-over design, 24 subjects participated in three separate breakfast sessions, and were served a low-energy-dense preload (53 kcal/100 g), a high-energy-dense preload (94 kcal/100 g), or no preload. Subjects received ambiguous information about the preload's satiating capacity and rated how confident they were about their expected satiation before consuming the preload in its entirety. They were served an ad libitum test meal 30 min later. Confidence ratings were negatively associated with energy compensation after consuming the high-energy-dense preload (r = -0.61; p = 0.001). The same relationship was evident after consuming the low-energy-dense preload, but only after controlling for dietary restraint, hunger prior to, and liking of the test meal (p = 0.03). Our results suggest that confidence modifies short-term controls of food intake by affecting energy compensation. These results merit consideration because imprecise caloric compensation has been identified as a potential risk factor for a positive energy balance and weight gain.

Indexed as

EmotionsSatiationAdultBreakfastCross-Over StudiesEatingEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumansHungerMalePortion SizeYoung Adultcompensationconfidenceenergy densityexpectationsexpected satiationoverconsumptionsatiationsatiety

Identifiers

PMID26115087
PMCPMC4516988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.