Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26114958›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A Land-Use Perspective for Birdstrike Risk Assessment: The Attraction Risk Index.

Francesca Coccon, Matteo Zucchetta, Giulia Bossi, Matteo Borrotti, Patrizia Torricelli, Piero Franzoi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bird Diversity and Bird-Strike Risk at Lincang Boshang Airport.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The abundance of yellow-legged gullsUrban ecosystems · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca CocconDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Venice, Italy.
Matteo ZucchettaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Venice, Italy.
Giulia BossiCNR-IRPI-National Research Council of Italy, Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection, Padua, Italy.
Matteo BorrottiEuropean Centre for Living Technology, University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Venice, Italy; CNR-IMATI-National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Applied Mathematics and Information Technology, Milan, Italy.
Patrizia TorricelliDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Venice, Italy.
Piero FranzoiDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Venice, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collisions between aircraft and birds, birdstrikes, pose a serious threat to aviation safety. The occurrence of these events is influenced by land-uses in the surroundings of airports. Airports located in the same region might have different trends for birdstrike risk, due to differences in the surrounding habitats. Here we developed a quantitative tool that assesses the risk of birdstrike based on the habitats within a 13-km buffer from the airport. For this purpose, we developed Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) with binomial distribution to estimate the contribution of habitats to wildlife use of the study area, depending on season. These GLMs predictions were combined to the flight altitude of birds within the 13-km buffer, the airport traffic pattern and the severity indices associated with impacts. Our approach was developed at Venice Marco Polo International airport (VCE), located in northeast Italy and then tested at Treviso Antonio Canova International airport (TSF), which is 20 km inland. Results from the two airports revealed that both the surrounding habitats and the season had a significant influence to the pattern of risk. With regard to VCE, agricultural fields, wetlands and urban areas contributed most to the presence of birds in the study area. Furthermore, the key role of distance of land-uses from the airport on the probability of presence of birds was highlighted. The reliability of developed risk index was demonstrated since at VCE it was significantly correlated with bird strike rate. This study emphasizes the importance of the territory near airports and the wildlife use of its habitats, as factors in need of consideration for birdstrike risk assessment procedures. Information on the contribution of habitats in attracting birds, depending on season, can be used by airport managers and local authorities to plan specific interventions in the study area in order to lower the risk.

Indexed as

Accidents, AviationAircraftBirdsNatural ResourcesRisk AssessmentAirportsAnimalsHumansItalyModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID26114958
PMCPMC4482575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.