ArticleThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015
Chelation for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Article in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Memantine for autism spectrum disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- An Open-Label Case Series of Glutathione Use for Symptomatic Management in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Trial
- Delays to Behavioral Therapy in Michigan for Children Diagnosed with Autism: A Summary of Needs Assessment Outcomes to Inform Public Policy Advocacy Initiatives.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- Abnormal Porphyrin Metabolism in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Therapeutic Implications.Molecular neurobiology · 2024Review
- Porphyrinuria in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Anti-ableism and scientific accuracy in autism research: a false dichotomy.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Chelation in Antibacterial Drugs: From Nitroxoline to Cefiderocol and Beyond.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The Neurodiversity Approach(es): What Are They and What Do They Mean for Researchers?Human development · 2022Article
- Ethical dimensions of translational developmental neuroscience research in autism.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2021Review
- Practitioner's review: medication for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and comorbid conditions.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2021Review
- Evaluating Sensory Integration/Sensory Processing Treatment: Issues and Analysis.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2020Review
- Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Lead Poisoning: Diagnostic Challenges and Management Complexities.Clinical pediatrics · 2019Review
- Utilization of Complementary and Alternative Therapies in Youth with Developmental Disabilities.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019Article
- Parents' Use of Complementary Health Approaches for Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2018Article
- Parent disclosure of complementary health approaches used for children with autism spectrum disorder: Barriers and facilitators.Complementary therapies in medicine · 2017Article
- Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials for Autism Spectrum Disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2017Article
- The Brain-Gut-Microbiome Axis: What Role Does It Play in Autism Spectrum Disorder?Current developmental disorders reports · 2016Article
- What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for autism spectrum disorders?Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicinaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt has been suggested that the severity of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) symptoms is positively correlated with the level of circulating or stored toxic metals, and that excretion of these heavy metals, brought about by the use of pharmaceutical chelating agents, results in improved symptoms.
objectivesTo assess the potential benefits and adverse effects of pharmaceutical chelating agents (referred to as chelation therapy throughout this review) for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) symptoms. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the following databases on 6 November 2014: CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and 15 other databases, including three trials registers. In addition we checked references lists and contacted experts. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials of pharmaceutical chelating agents compared with placebo in individuals with ASD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed them for risk of bias and extracted relevant data. We did not conduct a meta-analysis, as only one study was included. MAIN
resultsWe excluded nine studies because they were non-randomised trials or were withdrawn before enrolment. We included one study, which was conducted in two phases. During the first phase of the study, 77 children with ASD were randomly assigned to receive seven days of glutathione lotion or placebo lotion, followed by three days of oral dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). Forty-nine children who were found to be high excreters of heavy metals during phase one continued on to phase two to receive three days of oral DMSA or placebo followed by 11 days off, with the cycle repeated up to six times. The second phase thus assessed the effectiveness of multiple doses of oral DMSA compared with placebo in children who were high excreters of heavy metals and who received a three-day course of oral DMSA. Overall, no evidence suggests that multiple rounds of oral DMSA had an effect on ASD symptoms. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review included data from only one study, which had methodological limitations. As such, no clinical trial evidence was found to suggest that pharmaceutical chelation is an effective intervention for ASD. Given prior reports of serious adverse events, such as hypocalcaemia, renal impairment and reported death, the risks of using chelation for ASD currently outweigh proven benefits. Before further trials are conducted, evidence that supports a causal link between heavy metals and autism and methods that ensure the safety of participants are needed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.