Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26114610›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis of a Cardiac Cell Model Using a Gaussian Process Emulator.

Eugene T Y Chang, Mark Strong, Richard H Clayton

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Variability in electrophysiological properties and conducting obstacles controls re-entry risk in heterogeneous ischaemic tissue.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evaluating Parameter Uncertainty in a Simulation Model of Cancer Using Emulators.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019
    Article
  15. Computational models in cardiology.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eugene T Y ChangInsigneo Institute for in-silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Department of Computer Science University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Mark StrongSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Richard H ClaytonInsigneo Institute for in-silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Department of Computer Science University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2012-05-258Medical Research Council G0601721Medical Research Council MR/J000434/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models of electrical activity in cardiac cells have become important research tools as they can provide a quantitative description of detailed and integrative physiology. However, cardiac cell models have many parameters, and how uncertainties in these parameters affect the model output is difficult to assess without undertaking large numbers of model runs. In this study we show that a surrogate statistical model of a cardiac cell model (the Luo-Rudy 1991 model) can be built using Gaussian process (GP) emulators. Using this approach we examined how eight outputs describing the action potential shape and action potential duration restitution depend on six inputs, which we selected to be the maximum conductances in the Luo-Rudy 1991 model. We found that the GP emulators could be fitted to a small number of model runs, and behaved as would be expected based on the underlying physiology that the model represents. We have shown that an emulator approach is a powerful tool for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in cardiac cell models.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAction PotentialsAnimalsBayes TheoremHeart Conduction SystemHumansMyocardium

Identifiers

PMID26114610
PMCPMC4482712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.