ArticlePloS one2015
Ensemble Methods for MiRNA Target Prediction from Expression Data.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scanning sample-specific miRNA regulation from bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing data.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Based Methods and Best Practices of microRNA-Target Prediction and Validation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Review
- Predicting miRNA targets for hepatocellular carcinoma with an integrated method.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Improving Bioinformatics Prediction of microRNA Targets by Ranks Aggregation.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Systematic prediction of target genes and pathways in cervical cancer from microRNA expression data.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Integrative analysis reveals disrupted pathways regulated by microRNAs in cancer.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- miRNAtools: Advanced Training Using the miRNA Web of Knowledge.Non-coding RNA · 2018Article
- Integration analysis of microRNA and mRNA paired expression profiling identifies deregulated microRNA-transcription factor-gene regulatory networks in ovarian endometriosis.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2018Article
- An Ensemble Method to Predict Target Genes and Pathways in Uveal Melanoma.Open life sciences · 2018Article
- Combinatorial ensemble miRNA target prediction of co-regulation networks with non-prediction data.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- DMirNet: Inferring direct microRNA-mRNA association networks.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Identification of miRNA-mRNA regulatory modules by exploring collective group relationships.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Discovering MicroRNA-Regulatory Modules in Multi-Dimensional Cancer Genomic Data: A Survey of Computational Methods.Cancer informatics · 2016Review
- Predicting miRNA Targets by Integrating Gene Regulatory Knowledge with Expression Profiles.PloS one · 2016Article
- Article
- Combining Supervised and Unsupervised Learning for Improved miRNA Target Prediction.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundmicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short regulatory RNAs that are involved in several diseases, including cancers. Identifying miRNA functions is very important in understanding disease mechanisms and determining the efficacy of drugs. An increasing number of computational methods have been developed to explore miRNA functions by inferring the miRNA-mRNA regulatory relationships from data. Each of the methods is developed based on some assumptions and constraints, for instance, assuming linear relationships between variables. For such reasons, computational methods are often subject to the problem of inconsistent performance across different datasets. On the other hand, ensemble methods integrate the results from individual methods and have been proved to outperform each of their individual component methods in theory.
resultsIn this paper, we investigate the performance of some ensemble methods over the commonly used miRNA target prediction methods. We apply eight different popular miRNA target prediction methods to three cancer datasets, and compare their performance with the ensemble methods which integrate the results from each combination of the individual methods. The validation results using experimentally confirmed databases show that the results of the ensemble methods complement those obtained by the individual methods and the ensemble methods perform better than the individual methods across different datasets. The ensemble method, Pearson+IDA+Lasso, which combines methods in different approaches, including a correlation method, a causal inference method, and a regression method, is the best performed ensemble method in this study. Further analysis of the results of this ensemble method shows that the ensemble method can obtain more targets which could not be found by any of the single methods, and the discovered targets are more statistically significant and functionally enriched. The source codes, datasets, miRNA target predictions by all methods, and the ground truth for validation are available in the Supplementary materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.