Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26114244›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

Quantification of Protozoa and Viruses from Small Water Volumes.

J Alfredo Bonilla, Tonya D Bonilla, Amir M Abdelzaher, Troy M Scott, Jerzy Lukasik, Helena M Solo-Gabriele, Carol J Palmer

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lessons learned from SARS-CoV-2 measurements in wastewater.The Science of the total environment · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Health Effects of Waterborne Contaminants: A Focus on Emerging Concerns.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  9. Fine-Scale Spatial Heterogeneity in the Distribution of Waterborne Protozoa in a Drinking Water Reservoir.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J Alfredo BonillaOceans and Human Health Center, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, FL 33149, USA. j.alfred.bonilla@uwrf.edu.
Tonya D BonillaOceans and Human Health Center, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, FL 33149, USA. tdbonilla@mmm.com.
Amir M AbdelzaherOceans and Human Health Center, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, FL 33149, USA. amabdelzaher@gmail.com.
Troy M ScottOceans and Human Health Center, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, FL 33149, USA. drtmscott@gmail.com.
Jerzy LukasikBCS Laboratories, Inc., Gainesville FL 32609, USA. Lukasik@microbioservices.com.
Helena M Solo-GabrieleOceans and Human Health Center, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, FL 33149, USA. hmsolo@miami.edu.
Carol J PalmerOceans and Human Health Center, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, FL 33149, USA. carolpalmer@biostarconsulting.com.

Funding

Toxic Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs)P50ES012736 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ROSENTEIL SCHOOL · PI FLEMING, LORA ELDERKIN · 2004 to 2010
$2.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS P50 ES012736NIEHS NIH HHS P50 ES12736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large sample volumes are traditionally required for the analysis of waterborne pathogens. The need for large volumes greatly limits the number of samples that can be processed. The aims of this study were to compare extraction and detection procedures for quantifying protozoan parasites and viruses from small volumes of marine water. The intent was to evaluate a logistically simpler method of sample collection and processing that would facilitate direct pathogen measures as part of routine monitoring programs. Samples were collected simultaneously using a bilayer device with protozoa capture by size (top filter) and viruses capture by charge (bottom filter). Protozoan detection technologies utilized for recovery of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. were qPCR and the more traditional immunomagnetic separation-IFA-microscopy, while virus (poliovirus) detection was based upon qPCR versus plaque assay. Filters were eluted using reagents consistent with the downstream detection technologies. Results showed higher mean recoveries using traditional detection methods over qPCR for Cryptosporidium (91% vs. 45%) and poliovirus (67% vs. 55%) whereas for Giardia the qPCR-based methods were characterized by higher mean recoveries (41% vs. 28%). Overall mean recoveries are considered high for all detection technologies. Results suggest that simultaneous filtration may be suitable for isolating different classes of pathogens from small marine water volumes. More research is needed to evaluate the suitability of this method for detecting pathogens at low ambient concentration levels.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyWater QualityCryptosporidiumFiltrationGiardiaImmunomagnetic SeparationPoliovirusPolymerase Chain ReactionSeawaterCryptosporidiumenterovirusGiardiaquantitative PCRwater quality

Identifiers

PMID26114244
PMCPMC4515645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.