Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26113811›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2015

The effects of neuron morphology on graph theoretic measures of network connectivity: the analysis of a two-level statistical model.

Jugoslava Aćimović, Tuomo Mäki-Marttunen, Marja-Leena Linne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neural arbors are Pareto optimal.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Small-World Brain Networks Revisited.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Editorial: Quantitative Analysis of Neuroanatomy.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jugoslava AćimovićComputational Neuroscience Group, Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology Tampere, Finland.
Tuomo Mäki-MarttunenComputational Neuroscience Group, Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology Tampere, Finland ; Psychosis Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo Oslo, Norway.
Marja-Leena LinneComputational Neuroscience Group, Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology Tampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a two-level statistical model that addresses the question of how properties of neurite morphology shape the large-scale network connectivity. We adopted a low-dimensional statistical description of neurites. From the neurite model description we derived the expected number of synapses, node degree, and the effective radius, the maximal distance between two neurons expected to form at least one synapse. We related these quantities to the network connectivity described using standard measures from graph theory, such as motif counts, clustering coefficient, minimal path length, and small-world coefficient. These measures are used in a neuroscience context to study phenomena from synaptic connectivity in the small neuronal networks to large scale functional connectivity in the cortex. For these measures we provide analytical solutions that clearly relate different model properties. Neurites that sparsely cover space lead to a small effective radius. If the effective radius is small compared to the overall neuron size the obtained networks share similarities with the uniform random networks as each neuron connects to a small number of distant neurons. Large neurites with densely packed branches lead to a large effective radius. If this effective radius is large compared to the neuron size, the obtained networks have many local connections. In between these extremes, the networks maximize the variability of connection repertoires. The presented approach connects the properties of neuron morphology with large scale network properties without requiring heavy simulations with many model parameters. The two-steps procedure provides an easier interpretation of the role of each modeled parameter. The model is flexible and each of its components can be further expanded. We identified a range of model parameters that maximizes variability in network connectivity, the property that might affect network capacity to exhibit different dynamical regimes.

Indexed as

graph theorymotifsnetwork connectivityneurite density fieldneuron morphologytheoretical model

Identifiers

PMID26113811
PMCPMC4461825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.