Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26113653›Full record

SynthesisClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2015

Aspergillus Polymerase Chain Reaction: Systematic Review of Evidence for Clinical Use in Comparison With Antigen Testing.

P Lewis White, John R Wingard, Stéphane Bretagne, Jürgen Löffler, Thomas F Patterson, Monica A Slavin, Rosemary A Barnes, Peter G Pappas, J Peter Donnelly

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 181 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances in pathogen detection ofInfectious medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

P Lewis WhitePublic Health Wales, Microbiology Cardiff, United Kingdom.
John R WingardUniversity of Florida Health, Gainsville.
Stéphane BretagneParis Diderot University, Saint Louis Hospital-AP-HP, France.
Jürgen LöfflerWuerzburg University, Germany.
Thomas F PattersonUniversity of Texas Health Science Center and South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio.
Monica A SlavinPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Rosemary A BarnesInfection, Immunity and Biochemistry, Cardiff University, United Kingdom.
Peter G PappasUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
J Peter DonnellyRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cardiff University · GBDélégation Paris 7 · FRPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUPublic Health Wales · GBRadboud University Medical Center · NLSouth Texas Veterans Health Care System · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Florida Health · USUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAspergillus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was excluded from the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) definitions of invasive fungal disease because of limited standardization and validation. The definitions are being revised.

methodsA systematic literature review was performed to identify analytical and clinical information available on inclusion of galactomannan enzyme immunoassay (GM-EIA) (2002) and β-d-glucan (2008), providing a minimal threshold when considering PCR. Categorical parameters and statistical performance were compared.

resultsWhen incorporated, GM-EIA and β-d-glucan sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis were 81.6% and 91.6%, and 76.9% and 89.4%, respectively. Aspergillus PCR has similar sensitivity and specificity (76.8%-88.0% and 75.0%-94.5%, respectively) and comparable utility. Methodological recommendations and commercial PCR assays assist standardization. Although all tests have limitations, currently, PCR is the only test with independent quality control.

conclusionsWe propose that there is sufficient evidence that is at least equivalent to that used to include GM-EIA and β-d-glucan testing, and that PCR is now mature enough for inclusion in the EORTC/MSG definitions.

Indexed as

Immunoenzyme TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionAntigens, FungalAspergillosisAspergillusbeta-GlucansGalactoseHumansMannansQuality ControlSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, Fungalbeta-GlucansgalactomannanGalactoseMannansaspergillosisAspergillusgalactomannanPCRβ-d-glucan

Identifiers

PMID26113653
PMCPMC4583581
OpenAlexW2229990733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.