Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26113041›Full record

ArticleCell death and differentiation2016

HIPK2 restricts SIRT1 activity upon severe DNA damage by a phosphorylation-controlled mechanism.

E Conrad, T Polonio-Vallon, M Meister, S Matt, N Bitomsky, C Herbel, M Liebl, V Greiner, B Kriznik, S Schumacher and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death and differentiation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E ConradGerman Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Cellular Senescence Group, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
T Polonio-VallonGerman Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Cellular Senescence Group, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
M MeisterGerman Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Cellular Senescence Group, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
S MattGerman Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Cellular Senescence Group, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
N BitomskyGerman Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Cellular Senescence Group, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
C HerbelGerman Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Cellular Senescence Group, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
M LieblGerman Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Cellular Senescence Group, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
V GreinerGerman Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Cellular Senescence Group, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
B KriznikGerman Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Cellular Senescence Group, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
S SchumacherGerman Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Cellular Senescence Group, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
E Krieghoff-HenningGerman Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Cellular Senescence Group, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
T G HofmannGerman Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Cellular Senescence Group, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance · DEHeidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upon severe DNA damage a cellular signalling network initiates a cell death response through activating tumour suppressor p53 in association with promyelocytic leukaemia (PML) nuclear bodies. The deacetylase Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) suppresses cell death after DNA damage by antagonizing p53 acetylation. To facilitate efficient p53 acetylation, SIRT1 function needs to be restricted. How SIRT1 activity is regulated under these conditions remains largely unclear. Here we provide evidence that SIRT1 activity is limited upon severe DNA damage through phosphorylation by the DNA damage-responsive kinase HIPK2. We found that DNA damage provokes interaction of SIRT1 and HIPK2, which phosphorylates SIRT1 at Serine 682 upon lethal damage. Furthermore, upon DNA damage SIRT1 and HIPK2 colocalize at PML nuclear bodies, and PML depletion abrogates DNA damage-induced SIRT1 Ser682 phosphorylation. We show that Ser682 phosphorylation inhibits SIRT1 activity and impacts on p53 acetylation, apoptotic p53 target gene expression and cell death. Mechanistically, we found that DNA damage-induced SIRT1 Ser682 phosphorylation provokes disruption of the complex between SIRT1 and its activator AROS. Our findings indicate that phosphorylation-dependent restriction of SIRT1 activity by HIPK2 shapes the p53 response.

Indexed as

AcetylationApoptosisCarrier ProteinsCell Line, TumorDNA DamageGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLeukemia, Promyelocytic, AcutePhosphorylationProtein BindingProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSirtuin 1Tumor Suppressor Protein p53Carrier ProteinsHIPK2 protein, humanProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSIRT1 protein, humanSirtuin 1TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID26113041
PMCPMC4815982
OpenAlexW1522342683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.