Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26112692›Full record

ArticleFungal genetics and biology : FG & B2015

Rapid mapping of insertional mutations to probe cell wall regulation in Cryptococcus neoformans.

Shannon K Esher, Joshua A Granek, J Andrew Alspaugh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Optimizing Transformation Frequency ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. CoremBio · 2020
    Article
  9. Cryptococcus neoformans Mating and Genetic Crosses.Current protocols in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The use of3 Biotech · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shannon K EsherDepartment of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: shannon.esher@duke.edu.
Joshua A GranekDepartment of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Duke Center for the Genomics of Microbial Systems, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: joshua.granek@duke.edu.
J Andrew AlspaughDepartment of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: andrew.alspaugh@duke.edu.
Duke University · US

Funding

Coordinated Regulation of Virulence Genes in C. neoformansR01AI074677 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALSPAUGH, ANDREW, WORMLEY, FLOYD L. · 2011 to 2020
$4.0M
Coordinated Regulation of Virulence Genes in C. neoformansR56AI074677 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALSPAUGH, ANDREW · 2009 to 2010
$608k
NIAID NIH HHS AI074677NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI074677NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI074677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random insertional mutagenesis screens are important tools in microbial genetics studies. Investigators in fungal systems have used the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens to create tagged, random mutations for genetic screens in their fungal species of interest through a unique process of trans-kingdom cellular transconjugation. However, identifying the locations of insertion has traditionally required tedious PCR-based methods, limiting the effective throughput of this system. We have developed an efficient genomic sequencing and analysis method (AIM-Seq) to facilitate identification of randomly generated genomic insertions in microorganisms. AIM-Seq combines batch sampling, whole genome sequencing, and a novel bioinformatics pipeline, AIM-HII, to rapidly identify sites of genomic insertion. We have specifically applied this technique to Agrobacterium-mediated transconjugation in the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. With this approach, we have screened a library of C. neoformans cell wall mutants, selecting twenty-seven mutants of interest for analysis by AIM-Seq. We identified thirty-five putative genomic insertions in known and previously unknown regulators of cell wall processes in this pathogenic fungus. We confirmed the relevance of a subset of these by creating independent mutant strains and analyzing resulting cell wall phenotypes. Through our sequence-based analysis of these mutations, we observed "typical" insertions of the Agrobacterium transfer DNA as well as atypical insertion events, including large deletions and chromosomal rearrangements. Initially applied to C. neoformans, this mutant analysis tool can be applied to a wide range of experimental systems and methods of mutagenesis, facilitating future microbial genetic screens.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingMutagenesis, InsertionalCell WallConjugation, GeneticCryptococcus neoformansGenes, FungalGenome, FungalPhenotypePolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNAAgrobacterium-mediated transconjugationAIM-SeqCryptococcus neoformansFungal cell wallFungal pathogenInsertional mutagenesisT-DNA

Identifiers

PMID26112692
PMCPMC4693612
OpenAlexW752606104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.