Trial reportAdvances in therapy2015
Efficacy of Tiotropium + Olodaterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Initial Disease Severity and Treatment Intensity: A Post Hoc Analysis.
Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) Compared With the Individual Components (2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium, 5 µg Olodaterol) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). [TOnado TM 1]
A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) Compared With the Individual Components (2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium, 5 µg Olodaterol) (Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler) in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [TOnado TM 2]
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Once daily long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in a combined inhaler versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tiotropium and olodaterol in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Respiratory research · 2017Pooled it
- Glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler for maintenance-naïve patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a post-hoc analysis of the randomized PINNACLE trials.Respiratory research · 2020Trial
- First-Line Treatment with Tiotropium/Olodaterol Improves Physical Activity in Patients with Treatment-Naïve Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Trial
- Effect of tiotropium/olodaterol on sedentary and active time in patients with COPD: post hoc analysis of the VESUTOInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019Trial
- Efficacy of tiotropium and olodaterol combination therapy on dynamic lung hyperinflation evaluated by hyperventilation in COPD: an open-label, comparative before and after treatment study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019Trial
- Indacaterol and glycopyrronium versus indacaterol on body plethysmography measurements in COPD-a randomised controlled study.Respiratory research · 2017Trial
- Assessing Short-term Deterioration in Maintenance-naïve Patients with COPD Receiving Umeclidinium/Vilanterol and Tiotropium: A Pooled Analysis of Three Randomized Trials.Advances in therapy · 2017Trial
- Lung function and long-term safety of tiotropium/olodaterol in East Asian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017Trial
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Developments in Pharmacological Treatments.Drugs · 2025Review
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fixed-Dose Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus Tiotropium for COPD Patients in China.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023Article
- LABA/LAMA as First-Line Therapy for COPD: A Summary of the Evidence and Guideline Recommendations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Future concepts in bronchodilation for COPD: dual-European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Review
- Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium or glycopyrronium in long-acting bronchodilator-naïve COPD patients: A pooled analysis.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2020Article
- Tiotropium/Olodaterol: A Review in COPD.Drugs · 2019Review
- What Does the TOVITO Programme Tell Us about How We Can Manage COPD?Turkish thoracic journal · 2018Review
- Inhaled therapies in patients with moderate COPD in clinical practice: current thinking.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018Review
- The Role of Tiotropium+Olodaterol Dual Bronchodilator Therapy in the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2018Review
- Smart watch-based coaching with tiotropium and olodaterol ameliorates physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
- Effects of tiotropium + olodaterol versus tiotropium or placebo by COPD disease severity and previous treatment history in the OTEMTO® studies.Respiratory research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium and once-daily long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) olodaterol have been studied as a once-daily fixed-dose combination (FDC) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Two large, 52-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies in patients with moderate-very severe COPD demonstrated that tiotropium + olodaterol significantly improved lung function and symptoms versus the monocomponents. This post hoc analysis determined effects on lung function by prior LAMA or LABA maintenance treatment and initial disease severity.
methods5162 patients were randomized and treated with olodaterol 5 µg, tiotropium 2.5 µg, tiotropium 5 µg, tiotropium + olodaterol 2.5/5 µg, or tiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 µg (all once daily via Respimat(®) inhaler). Primary efficacy (lung-function) end points were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 3 h (AUC0-3) and trough FEV1 responses (i.e., change from baseline). Pooled data are presented for the following subgroups: prior maintenance treatment with LAMA or LABA, Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2 (predicted FEV1 50% to <80%) and 3 (30% to <50%)/4 (<30%), sex, age, and prior use of inhaled corticosteroids.
resultsTiotropium + olodaterol FDC improved lung function over the monocomponents in patients with GOLD 2 and 3-4 disease, irrespective of prior LAMA or LABA maintenance therapy; most comparisons between FDCs and their respective monocomponents were statistically significant (P < 0.05). FEV1 AUC0-3 and trough FEV1 responses for the individual treatments were generally greater in patients with less severe COPD at baseline.
conclusionsTiotropium + olodaterol 5/5 µg significantly improved FEV1 AUC0-3 and trough FEV1 in all GOLD severity groups compared to olodaterol 5 µg and tiotropium 5 µg alone, irrespective of whether patients had received prior LAMA or LABA maintenance treatment. Improvements from baseline in lung function were generally greater in patients with less severe disease.
fundingBoehringer Ingelheim.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01431274 and NCT01431287.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.