Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26112224›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

A pilot randomised controlled trial of personalised care after treatment for prostate cancer (TOPCAT-P): nurse-led holistic-needs assessment and individualised psychoeducational intervention: study protocol.

Marian Andrei Stanciu, Caroline Morris, Matt Makin, Eila Watson, Jenna Bulger, Richard Evans, Julia Hiscock, Zoë Hoare, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Richard David Neal and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Educational Needs in Oncology Nursing: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marian Andrei StanciuNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.
Caroline MorrisBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, UK.
Matt MakinBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, UK.
Eila WatsonDepartment of Clinical Health Care, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Jenna BulgerNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.
Richard EvansNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.
Julia HiscockNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.
Zoë HoareNorth Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Rhiannon Tudor EdwardsCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Richard David NealNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.
Clare WilkinsonNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Wrexham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProstate cancer is common and the incidence is increasing, but more men are living longer after diagnosis, and die with their disease rather than of it. Nonetheless, specific and substantial physical, sexual, emotional and mental health problems often lead to a poor quality of life. Urology services increasingly struggle to cope with the demands of follow-up care, and primary care is likely to play the central role in long-term follow-up. The present phase II trial will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a nurse-led, person-centred psychoeducational intervention, delivered in community or primary care settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Prostate cancer survivors diagnosed in the past 9-48 months and currently biochemically stable will be identified from hospital records by their treating clinician. Eligible men would have either completed radical treatment, or would be followed up with prostate specific antigen monitoring and symptom reporting. We will recruit 120 patients who will be randomised to receive either an augmented form of usual care, or an additional nurse-led intervention for a period of 36 weeks. Following the health policy in Wales, the intervention is offered by a key worker, is promoting prudent healthcare and is using a holistic needs assessment. Outcome measures will assess physical symptoms, psychological well-being, confidence in managing own health and quality of life. Healthcare service use will be measured over 36 weeks. Feedback interviews with patients and clinicians will further inform the acceptability of the intervention. Recruitment, attrition, questionnaire completion rates and outcome measures variability will be assessed, and results will inform the design of a future phase III trial and accompanying economic evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by Bangor University and North Wales REC (13/WA/0291). Results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications, at scientific conferences, and directly through national cancer and primary care networks. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 34516019.

Indexed as

Holistic NursingPrecision MedicineAdaptation, PsychologicalAgedClinical ProtocolsFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentPatient Education as TopicPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeSelf CareNeeds AssessmentPRIMARY CAREUROLOGY

Identifiers

PMID26112224
PMCPMC4486944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.