Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26112200›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2015

Finding the Gatekeeper to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Coronary CT Angiography or Stress Testing?

Thomas H Marwick, Iksung Cho, Bríain Ó Hartaigh, James K Min

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Coronary computed tomography angiographyWorld journal of cardiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas H MarwickMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. Electronic address: Tom.Marwick@utas.edu.au.
Iksung ChoDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging at New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Bríain Ó HartaighDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging at New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
James K MinDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging at New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Funding

The Ischemia Trial - CCCU01HL105907 · NHLBI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2011 to 2019
$100.1M
Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
Patient-Specific Coronary Hemodynamics by 3D PrintingR01HL118019 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI DUNHAM, SIMON, LIN, FAY YU-HUEI · 2013 to 2022
$5.8M
Gender-Specific Coronary Plaque Characteristics and Risk of Myocardial InfarctionR01HL115150 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MIN, JAMES K · 2012 to 2016
$3.5M
Dual Energy Computed Tomography for Determining Coronary Lesion-Specific IschemiaR01HL111141 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI EDIC, PETER, MIN, JAMES K · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111141NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115150NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL118019NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL105907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional capacity is a robust predictor of clinical outcomes, and stress testing is used in current practice paradigms to guide referral to invasive coronary angiography. However, invasive coronary angiography is driven by ongoing symptoms, as well as risk of adverse outcomes. The limitations of current functional testing-based paradigms might be avoided by using coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) for exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease. The growth of CCTA has been supported by comparative prognostic evidence with CCTA and functional testing, as well as radiation dose reduction. Use of CCTA for physiological evaluation of coronary lesion-specific ischemia may facilitate evaluation of moderate stenoses, designation of the culprit lesion, and prediction of benefit from revascularization. The potential of CCTA to serve as an effective gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography will depend, in part, on the adoption of these new developments, as well as definition of the benefit of detecting high-risk plaque for guiding the management of selected patients.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyExercise TestTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcute DiseaseChest PainFemaleHumansLaboratoriesMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPrognosisanginaatheroscleroticcardiac catheterizationchest paincoronary artery diseasecoronary computed tomographyplaque

Identifiers

PMID26112200
PMCPMC4618380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.