Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26112165›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2017

Emergency medical service, nursing, and physician providers' perspectives on delirium identification and management.

Michael A LaMantia, Frank C Messina, Shola Jhanji, Arif Nazir, Mungai Maina, Siobhan McGuire, Cherri D Hobgood, Douglas K Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael A LaMantiaIndiana University Center for Aging Research and Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Frank C MessinaIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Shola JhanjiIndiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Arif NazirIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Mungai MainaIndiana University Center for Aging Research and Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN.
Siobhan McGuireIndiana University Center for Aging Research and Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN.
Cherri D HobgoodIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Douglas K MillerIndiana University Center for Aging Research and Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN.

Funding

Delirium Evaluation in the Emergency Department for Seniors (DEEDS)K23AG043498 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI LAMANTIA, MICHAEL ANDREW · 2014 to 2018
$633k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG043498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of the study The study objective was to understand providers' perceptions regarding identifying and treating older adults with delirium, a common complication of acute illness in persons with dementia, in the pre-hospital and emergency department environments. Design and methods The authors conducted structured focus group interviews with separate groups of emergency medical services staff, emergency nurses, and emergency physicians. Recordings of each session were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for themes with representative supporting quotations identified. Results Providers shared that the busy emergency department environment was the largest challenge to delirium recognition and treatment. When describing delirium, participants frequently detailed hyperactive features of delirium, rather than hypoactive features. Participants shared that they employed no clear diagnostic strategy for identifying the condition and that they used heterogeneous approaches to treat the condition. To improve care for older adults with delirium, emergency nurses identified the need for more training around the management of the condition. Emergency medical services providers identified the need for more support in managing agitated patients when in transport to the hospital and more guidance from emergency physicians on what information to collect from the patient's home environment. Emergency physicians felt that delirium care would be improved if they could have baseline mental status data on their patients and if they had access to a simple, accurate diagnostic tool for the condition. Implications Emergency medical services providers, emergency nurses, and emergency physicians frequently encounter delirious patients, but do not employ clear diagnostic strategies for identifying the condition and have varying levels of comfort in managing the condition. Clear steps should be taken to improve delirium care in the emergency department including the development of mechanisms to communicate patients' baseline mental status, the adoption of a systematized approach to recognizing delirium, and the institution of a standardized method to treat the condition when identified.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDeliriumEmergency Medical ServicesFocus GroupsHumansPhysiciansdeliriumdementiaemergency departmentfocus groupsgeriatrics

Identifiers

PMID26112165
PMCPMC5716472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.