ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015
The center for expanded data annotation and retrieval.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluation of Research Accessibility and Data Elements of HIV Registries.Current HIV research · 2019Pooled it
- HuBMAP Data Portal: a resource for multimodal spatial and single-cell data of healthy human tissues.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Unlocking the Power of Data Harmonization in Environmental Health Sciences: A Comprehensive Exploration of Significance, Use Cases, and Recommendations for Standardization Efforts.Environmental health perspectives · 2026Review
- The HuBMAP Framework for Advancing Data FAIRness.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The FAIRSCAPE AI-readiness Framework for Biomedical Research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Toward total recall: Enhancing data FAIRness through AI-driven metadata standardization.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Knowledge Engineering for Open Science: Building and Deploying Knowledge Bases for Metadata Standards.AI magazine · 2026Article
- The systematic assessment of completeness of public metadata accompanying omics studies in the Gene Expression Omnibus data repository.Genome biology · 2025Article
- A Cloud-Based Platform for Harmonized COVID-19 Data: Design and Implementation of the Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics (RADx) Data Hub.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Standardizing Survey Data Collection to Enhance Reproducibility: Development and Comparative Evaluation of the ReproSchema Ecosystem.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- BioPortal: an open community resource for sharing, searching, and utilizing biomedical ontologies.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Ensuring Adherence to Standards in Experiment-Related Metadata Entered Via Spreadsheets.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Article
- FAIR Data Cube, a FAIR data infrastructure for integrated multi-omics data analysis.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2024Article
- Domain adaptation in small-scale and heterogeneous biological datasets.Science advances · 2024Review
- The text2term tool to map free-text descriptions of biomedical terms to ontologies.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Best practices for managing and disseminating resources and outreach and evaluating the impact of the IDG Consortium.Drug discovery today · 2024Article
- Current state of data stewardship tools in life science.Frontiers in big data · 2024Review
- FAIR-EuMon: a FAIR-enabling resource for biodiversity monitoring schemes.Biodiversity data journal · 2024Article
- FAIR, ethical, and coordinated data sharing for COVID-19 response: a scoping review and cross-sectional survey of COVID-19 data sharing platforms and registries.The Lancet. Digital health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Center for Expanded Data Annotation and Retrieval is studying the creation of comprehensive and expressive metadata for biomedical datasets to facilitate data discovery, data interpretation, and data reuse. We take advantage of emerging community-based standard templates for describing different kinds of biomedical datasets, and we investigate the use of computational techniques to help investigators to assemble templates and to fill in their values. We are creating a repository of metadata from which we plan to identify metadata patterns that will drive predictive data entry when filling in metadata templates. The metadata repository not only will capture annotations specified when experimental datasets are initially created, but also will incorporate links to the published literature, including secondary analyses and possible refinements or retractions of experimental interpretations. By working initially with the Human Immunology Project Consortium and the developers of the ImmPort data repository, we are developing and evaluating an end-to-end solution to the problems of metadata authoring and management that will generalize to other data-management environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.