Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26112014›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2015

Why are some people more successful at lifestyle change than others? Factors associated with successful weight loss in the BeWEL randomised controlled trial of adults at risk of colorectal cancer.

Martine Stead, Angela M Craigie, Maureen Macleod, Jennifer McKell, Stephen Caswell, Robert J C Steele, Annie S Anderson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Letter to the editor regarding: Effects of behavioral change techniques on diet and physical activity in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  5. Changes in Lifestyle Factors After Endoscopic Screening: A Prospective Study in the United States.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Non-Surgical Interventions for Hospitalized Adults with Class II or Class III Obesity: A Scoping Review.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. DEBATE: Do interventions based on behavioral theory work in the real world?The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2019
    Article
  10. Healthy Eating as a New Way of Life: A Qualitative Study of Successful Long-Term Diet Change.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martine SteadInstitute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK. martine.stead@stir.ac.uk.
Angela M CraigieCentre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, Cancer Division, Medical Research Institute, Level 7, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK. a.craigie@dundee.ac.uk.
Maureen MacleodCentre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, Cancer Division, Medical Research Institute, Level 7, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK. m.macleod@dundee.ac.uk.
Jennifer McKellInstitute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK. j.e.mckell@stir.ac.uk.
Stephen CaswellCentre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, Cancer Division, Medical Research Institute, Level 7, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK. s.caswell@dundee.ac.uk.
Robert J C SteeleCentre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, Cancer Division, Medical Research Institute, Level 7, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK. r.j.c.steele@dundee.ac.uk.
Annie S AndersonCentre for Research into Cancer Prevention and Screening, Cancer Division, Medical Research Institute, Level 7, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK. a.s.anderson@dundee.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilCancer Research UKChief Scientist OfficeDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council G0802030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe BeWEL (BodyWEight and physicaL activity) randomised controlled trial demonstrated that a weight management programme offered in the colorectal cancer screening setting was effective. However, the differential responses of participants to the programme were notable. This study aimed to explore the factors associated with success and to identify implications for future programme design.

methodsAnalyses were conducted of quantitative data (n = 148) from the BeWEL intervention group to compare demographic and psychosocial characteristics and lifestyle changes in those who met and exceeded the target 7% weight loss ('super-achievers') with those who achieved only 'moderate' or 'low' amounts of weight loss (2-7% loss, or <2% loss, respectively). In-depth qualitative interviews (n = 24) explored in detail the motivations, actions, pathways to weight loss and circumstances of study participants.

resultsOver the 12 month intervention period, mean percentage weight loss of super-achievers (n = 33) was 11.5%, compared with moderate-achievers (n = 58) who lost 4.2%, and low-achievers (n = 57) who gained 0.8%. Compared to other groups, super- achievers increased their fruit and vegetable intake (p < 0.01) and physical activity (step count, p < 0.01). 'Super-achievers' did not differ in baseline demographic characteristics from other participants. However, significantly fewer reported that their activities were limited by physical and emotional health and they were more likely to perceive their current diet as harmful. Qualitative analyses found no consistent patterns among super-achievers in relation to some factors identified as important in previous studies, such as social support. However, super-achievers shared several characteristics such as determination and consistency in their engagement with the intervention, receptivity to new information and prompts, previous positive experience of changing health behaviours, being motivated by early success, making changes routine, and an ability to devise and apply strategies for dealing with setback and 'relapse' triggers.

conclusionsSuccessful lifestyle change depends on active engagement as well as effective intervention ingredients. Weight loss interventions are likely to be more effective where they can adapt to participants' differing characteristics and needs, while also providing core elements likely to build success.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorLife StyleWeight LossAgedBehavior TherapyBody WeightColorectal NeoplasmsDietFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26112014
PMCPMC4487855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.