Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26111975›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2015

Correlation of histopathologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with the oncotype DX DCIS score.

Adriana Knopfelmacher, Jana Fox, Yungtai Lo, Nella Shapiro, Susan Fineberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Microenvironment in DCIS and Its Role in Disease Progression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: an update for the pathologist in the era of individualized risk assessment and tailored therapies.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Legumain is an independent predictor for invasive recurrence in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2018
    Article
  19. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: friends or foes?Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adriana KnopfelmacherDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Jana FoxDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Yungtai LoDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health and Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Nella ShapiroDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Susan FinebergDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Montefiore Medical Center · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Oncotype DX Breast Cancer Assay for ductal carcinoma in situ is used to determine local recurrence risk in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. The results help select patients with low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ who could forgo radiation therapy after conservative surgery. The genes assessed include five proliferation genes, progesterone receptor (PR), and GSTM-1. Our objective was to determine if PR, mitotic counting, or any other pathologic feature of ductal carcinoma in situ could predict the Oncotype DX DCIS Score. We identified 46 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ with a Oncotype DX DCIS Score. In addition to information obtained from routine pathology, we counted mitotic figures in the ductal carcinoma in situ and noted presence of dense chronic inflammatory infiltrate surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ. We found that PR ≥ 90% (P = 0.004), mitotic count ≤ 1 (P = 0.045), estrogen receptor ≥ 90% (P = 0.046), and low nuclear grade (P < 0.0001) were associated with a low score. Dense chronic inflammation surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ was associated with a high score (P = 0.034).All 13 cases with PR ≥ 90%, ≤ 1 mitotic figure and absence of dense chronic inflammation around ductal carcinoma in situ had a low score (100% specificity). A low score was not observed in any case with at least two of the following--negative PR, >1 mitotic figure, and/or presence of dense chronic inflammation around ductal carcinoma in situ (100% specificity). Our study suggests using a combination of PR (≥ 90% vs negative) with mitotic count in ductal carcinoma in situ (≤ 1 vs >1) and dense chronic inflammation around ductal carcinoma in situ one could predict the Oncotype DX DCIS score. Mitotic counting and evaluation of immune response might provide prognostic information in ductal carcinoma in situ.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMitotic IndexNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID26111975
OpenAlexW1485617223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.