Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26111953›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Xerosis and pruritus as major EGFRI-associated adverse events.

Julia M K Clabbers, Christine B Boers-Doets, Hans Gelderblom, Theo Stijnen, Mario E Lacouture, Koos J M van der Hoeven, Adrian A Kaptein

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01136005 (Phase III Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Bepanthen® Cream Versus Cetomacrogol Cream in the Prevention of Papulopustular Eruption in Patients Receiving Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01136005 phase3completednot on this map

Phase III Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Bepanthen® Cream Versus Cetomacrogol Cream in the Prevention of Papulopustular Eruption in Patients Receiving Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors (EGFRI): BeCet

TypeinterventionalSponsorImpaqtt FoundationRan2010 to 2017Enrolled160ConditionsCancer, Skin RashArmsdexpanthenol 5% cream, Cetomacrogol cream
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The role of dermocosmetics in the management of cancer-related skin toxicities: international expert consensus.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Association between dermatologic adverse events and quality of life in lung cancer patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia M K ClabbersDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. juliamkclabbers@gmail.com.
Christine B Boers-DoetsDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hans GelderblomDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Theo StijnenDepartment of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mario E LacoutureDepartment of Medicine, Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Koos J M van der HoevenDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Adrian A KapteinDepartment of Medical Psychology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLLeiden University · NLMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this sub-analysis of the BeCet study (NCT01136005) was to examine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients experiencing dermatological adverse events (AEs) during the first 6 weeks of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI) treatment.

methodsPatients (n = 85) treated with EGFRI completed five questionnaires during the first 6 weeks of treatment. 77 patients provided enough data for the sub-analysis. Experienced AEs were reported in the Dermatological Reactions Targeted Therapy-Patients (DERETT-P), a symptom experience diary for patients treated with targeted therapy. The impact of EGFRI-associated dermatological adverse events on HRQoL was examined using four HRQoL questionnaires; the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-EGFRI (FACT-EGFRI-18), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Skindex-16.

resultsDuring the first 6 weeks of EGFRI treatment, physical discomfort was the most significantly affected domain. In the entire study population, xerosis (dry skin) (22.3 %) and pruritus (itchy skin) (16.9 %) were reported as the most impactful AEs. For patients experiencing a papulopustular eruption (acneiform rash) pruritus (24.2 %), xerosis (18.9 %), and papulopustular eruption (6.3 %) were reported as the most impactful AEs. Papulopustular eruption, xerosis, and pruritus all showed a significant negative effect on HRQoL, displayed in FACT-EGFRI-18 scores.

conclusionsIn addition to papulopustular eruption, xerosis and pruritus are major EGFRI-associated dermatological AEs with an impact on HRQoL, which warrant more attention in clinical practice and research.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsDrug EruptionsErbB ReceptorsExanthemaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPruritusQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAntineoplastic AgentsErbB ReceptorsCancerEpidermal growth factor receptor inhibitorPapulopustular eruptionPruritusQuality of lifeXerosis

Identifiers

PMID26111953
PMCPMC4689742
OpenAlexW1596719598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.