Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26111857›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2015

CKD as a Model for Improving Chronic Disease Care through Electronic Health Records.

Paul E Drawz, Patrick Archdeacon, Clement J McDonald, Neil R Powe, Kimberly A Smith, Jenna Norton, Desmond E Williams, Uptal D Patel, Andrew Narva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Validation of an Algorithm to Identify End-Stage Kidney Disease in Electronic Health Records Data.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Overcoming barriers to implementing new guideline-directed therapies for chronic kidney disease.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. CKD Management in Primary Care: Supporting Systems Change.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul E DrawzDivision of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota;
Patrick ArchdeaconOffice of Medical Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland;
Clement J McDonaldLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland;
Neil R PoweDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California;
Kimberly A SmithCenter for Clinical Standards and Quality, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland;
Jenna NortonNational Kidney Disease Education Program, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland;
Desmond E WilliamsNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and.
Uptal D PatelDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Andrew NarvaNational Kidney Disease Education Program, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland;

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
NLM's Personal Health Record and Consumer Service R&DZIALM008925 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI MCDONALD, CLEMENT · 2009 to 2020
$11.8M
Multi-factorial Intervention to Slow Progression of Diabetic Kidney DiseaseR01DK093938 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOSWORTH, HAYDEN B, DIAMANTIDIS, CLARISSA JONAS · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Using large Clinical Data bases to assess the association between patient factors, medication usage and patient outcomesZIALM008927 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI MCDONALD, CLEMENT · 2009 to 2015
$1.5M
Integrated Population Program for Diabetic Kidney DiseaseR34DK102166 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOSWORTH, HAYDEN B, BOULWARE, LEIGH E · 2014 to 2015
$711k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK093938NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK093938NIDDK NIH HHS R34 DK102166NIDDK NIH HHS R34-DK102166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health records have the potential to improve the care of patients with chronic medical conditions. CKD provides a unique opportunity to show this potential: the disease is common in the United States, there is significant room to improve CKD detection and management, CKD and its related conditions are defined primarily by objective laboratory data, CKD care requires collaboration by a diverse team of health care professionals, and improved access to CKD-related data would enable identification of a group of patients at high risk for multiple adverse outcomes. However, to realize the potential for improvement in CKD-related care, electronic health records will need to provide optimal functionality for providers and patients and interoperability across multiple health care settings. The goal of the National Kidney Disease Education Program Health Information Technology Working Group is to enable and support the widespread interoperability of data related to kidney health among health care software applications to optimize CKD detection and management. Over the course of the last 2 years, group members met to identify general strategies for using electronic health records to improve care for patients with CKD. This paper discusses these strategies and provides general goals for appropriate incorporation of CKD-related data into electronic health records and corresponding design features that may facilitate (1) optimal care of individual patients with CKD through improved access to clinical information and decision support, (2) clinical quality improvement through enhanced population management capabilities, (3) CKD surveillance to improve public health through wider availability of population-level CKD data, and (4) research to improve CKD management practices through efficiencies in study recruitment and data collection. Although these strategies may be most effectively applied in the setting of CKD, because it is primarily defined by laboratory abnormalities and therefore, an ideal computable electronic health record phenotype, they may also apply to other chronic diseases.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsMedical Record LinkageQuality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareCommunicationCooperative BehaviorData MiningDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDecision Support TechniquesHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationPatient Care TeamProfessional-Patient RelationsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicSelf CareCKDclinical nephrologykidney diseasekidney failurenephrology

Identifiers

PMID26111857
PMCPMC4527017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.