Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26111826›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2016

Long-term (up to 4.5 years) treatment with fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: results from the extension of the randomised TRANSFORMS study.

Jeffrey A Cohen, Bhupendra Khatri, Frederik Barkhof, Giancarlo Comi, Hans-Peter Hartung, Xavier Montalban, Jean Pelletier, Tracy Stites, Shannon Ritter, Philipp von Rosenstiel and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00340834 (A 12-month Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 0.5 mg and 1.25 mg Fingolimod), which is not on this map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00340834 phase3completednot on this map

A 12-month Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 0.5 mg and 1.25 mg Fingolimod (FTY720) Administered Orally Once Daily Versus Interferon ß-1a (Avonex) Administered im Once Weekly in Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis With Optional Extension Phase

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartisRan2006 to 2011Enrolled1,292ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsFingolimod 1.25 mg, Fingolimod 0.5 mg, Interferon β-1a 30 µg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Interleukin-31 and soluble CD40L: new candidate serum biomarkers that predict therapeutic response in multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Jeffrey A CohenNeurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Bhupendra KhatriCenter for Neurological Disorders and the Regional MS Center at WFHC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Frederik BarkhofImage Analysis Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Giancarlo ComiDepartment of Neurology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Hans-Peter HartungDepartment of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Xavier MontalbanDepartment of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Jean PelletierDepartment of Neurology and CRMBM CNRS6612, Aix Marseille Université, CHU La Timone, Marseille, France.
Tracy StitesNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Shannon RitterNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Philipp von RosenstielBiogen, 14 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Davorka TomicNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Ludwig KapposDepartments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
TRANSFORMS (TRial Assessing injectable interferoN vS. FTY720 Oral in RRMS) Study Group
Novartis (United States) · USAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLBiogen (United States) · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCleveland Clinic · USHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DENovartis (Switzerland) · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe 12-month (M), phase 3, double-blind, randomised TRANSFORMS study demonstrated significant benefits of fingolimod 0.5 or 1.25 mg over interferon β-1a (IFNβ-1a) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We report the results of long-term (up to 4.5 years) extension of TRANSFORMS.

methodsPatients randomised to fingolimod (0.5/1.25 mg) in the core phase continued the same dose (continuous-fingolimod) in the extension, whereas those on IFNβ-1a were re-randomised (1:1) to fingolimod (IFN-switch; IFN: 0.5/1.25 mg). Outcomes included annualised relapse rate (ARR), confirmed disability progression and MRI measures. Results are presented here for the continuous-fingolimod 0.5 mg and pooled IFN-switch groups.

resultsOf the 1027 patients who entered the extension, 772 (75.2%) completed the study. From baseline to the end of the study (EOS), ARR in patients on continuous-fingolimod 0.5 mg was significantly lower than in the IFN-switch group (M0-EOS: 0.17 vs 0.27). After switching to fingolimod (M0-12 vs M13-EOS), patients initially treated with IFN had a 50% reduction in ARR (0.40 vs 0.20), reduced MRI activity and a lower rate of brain volume loss. In a post hoc analysis, the proportion of IFN-switch patients with no evidence of disease activity increased by approximately 50% in the first year after switching to fingolimod treatment (44.3% to 66.0%). The safety profile was consistent with that observed in the core phase.

conclusionsThese results support a continued effect of long-term fingolimod therapy in maintaining a low rate of disease activity and sustained improved efficacy after switching from IFNβ-1a to fingolimod. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: NCT00340834.

Indexed as

AdultDisability EvaluationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFingolimod HydrochlorideHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon beta-1aMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNeuroimagingRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultFingolimod HydrochlorideImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon beta-1a

Identifiers

PMID26111826
PMCPMC4853559
OpenAlexW2284284866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.