Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26111816›Full record

SynthesisArchives of disease in childhood2015

Prevalence and associated harm of engagement in self-asphyxial behaviours ('choking game') in young people: a systematic review.

H Busse, T Harrop, D Gunnell, R Kipping

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of disease in childhood, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Analysis of trends in adolescent suicides and accidental deaths in England and Wales, 1972-2011.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2016
    Article
  11. Impact of Education on School-aged Children's Knowledge of and Participation in "The Choking Game".Research & reviews. Journal of nursing and health sciences · 2016
    Article
  12. The Choking Game on YouTube: An Update.Global pediatric health · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H BusseSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
T HarropIndependent Public Health Doctor.
D GunnellSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0829-6470
R KippingSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5446-8077
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation MR/KO232331/1Cancer Research UKMedical Research Council MR/K023233/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the prevalence of engagement in self-asphyxial (risk-taking) behaviour (SAB) ('choking game') and associated morbidity and mortality in children and young people up to age 20.

designSystematic literature review. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic database search of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, BIOSIS citation index and the Cochrane register with no language or date limits applied. References of key papers were reviewed, and experts were contacted to identify additional relevant papers. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Systematic reviews, cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies, and case reports examining SAB with regard to individuals aged 0-20 years, without explicitly stated autoerotic, suicidal or self-harm intentions were included.

resultsThirty-six relevant studies were identified, and SAB was reported in 10 countries. In North America, France and Colombia, awareness of SAB ranged from 36% to 91% across studies/settings, and the median lifetime prevalence of engagement in SAB was 7.4%. Six studies identified the potential for SAB to be associated with engagement in other risk behaviours. Ninety-nine fatal cases were reported. Of the 24 cases described in detail, most occurred when individuals engaged in SAB alone and used a ligature.

conclusionsThe current evidence on SAB among young people is limited, and stems predominantly from North America and France. Awareness of SAB among young people is high, and engagement varies by setting. Further research is needed to understand the level of risk and harm associated with SAB, and to determine the appropriate public health response.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAirway ObstructionChildFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsSelf-Injurious BehaviorYoung AdultAdolescent HealthInjury PreventionPaediatric PracticePublic HealthSchool Health

Identifiers

PMID26111816
PMCPMC4680200
OpenAlexW1950009405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.