ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2016
[Analysis of vaccination data of patients aged 60 years and older from Bavaria and Thuringia].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Once vaccinated, always vaccinated? A claims data analysis on repeated influenza vaccinations among individuals aged ≥ 60 years].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023Observational
- Adherence to STIKO recommendations in patients with pulmonary disease in southeast Germany.Infection · 2021Article
- A snapshot of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management in general practice in Ireland.Irish journal of medical science · 2021Article
- Adult vaccination against tetanus and diphtheria: the European perspective.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite annual updates of vaccination recommendations by the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) at the Robert Koch Institute, diseases preventable by vaccination still cause a relevant burden of disease in the elderly.
objectivesA comparison of the vaccination status of the elderly in Bavaria and Thuringia was carried out. MATERIAL AND
methodsMedical settlement data from the first quarter of 2007 to the second quarter of 2008 from the association of panel doctors in Bavaria and Thuringia for insured persons aged 60 years and above were analyzed concerning vaccinations, age, gender and multimorbidity. The vaccination rates for influenza were calculated.
resultsThe use of all recommended vaccinations in this age group was greater in Thuringia (eastern federal state) than in Bavaria (western federal state). In both states the administration rates of tetanus and diphtheria vaccines were lower in individuals with higher comorbidity and age. Protection rates against diphtheria were incomplete as a result of inadequate use of combination vaccines. In both states the administration of pneumococcal vaccine was higher in subjects with more comorbidities. In Bavaria administration rates increased with age. Influenza vaccination rates increased in association with age and comorbidity in both states. In elderly individuals influenza vaccination was used more often in the third quarter of 2007.
conclusionOld age and multimorbidity are often insufficiently taken into consideration in studies on vaccination rates. The data from this study confirmed the relevant findings from other studies and emphasize the deficient implementation of standard vaccinations in primary prevention. In this study very old patients were differentiated and considered according to age groups for the first time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.