Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26111635›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2015

Low anterior resection combined with a covering stoma in the treatment of rectal cancer reduces the risk of permanent anastomotic failure.

Minna Räsänen, Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo, Monika Carpelan-Holmström, Anna Lepistö

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Minna RäsänenColorectal Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11-13, Pl 263, 00029, Helsinki, Finland. minna.rasanen@hus.fi.
Laura Renkonen-SinisaloColorectal Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11-13, Pl 263, 00029, Helsinki, Finland. laura.renkonen-sinisalo@hus.fi.
Monika Carpelan-HolmströmColorectal Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11-13, Pl 263, 00029, Helsinki, Finland. monika.carpelan-holmstrom@hus.fi.
Anna LepistöColorectal Surgery, Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11-13, Pl 263, 00029, Helsinki, Finland. anna.lepisto@hus.fi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe adoption of the total mesorectum excision technique and circular stapler devices has enabled the performance of ultralow colorectal anastomosis in rectal cancer surgery. However, rupture of the anastomosis still usually leads to a permanent stoma. The aim of this study was to analyze the cumulative failure rate and risk factors associated with reversal of colorectal or coloanal anastomosis after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer, using standardized surgical regimen with the routine use of covering stoma. Our secondary interest was the feasibilities of redo surgery after failure.

methodsThis was a retrospective study with 579 consecutive rectal cancer patients operated on at Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland during 2005-2011. Data were collected from patient records. After exclusions, 273 consecutive patients treated with a low anterior resection with a protective stoma were included.

resultsIn total, 23 out of 271 (8.5 %) of the colorectal/coloanal anastomoses were converted to a permanent stoma. In five patients (1.8 %), the covering stoma was not closed. The permanent stoma rate was thus 28 out of 271 (10.3 %). The risk factors associated with failure were the tumor distance from the anal verge (p = 0.03), coloanal anastomosis (p = 0.003), early anastomotic complication (p < 0.001), anastomotic fistula (p < 0.001), anal incontinence (p = 0.05), and local recurrence (p < 0.001).

conclusionsOur standardized surgical regimen with a covering stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer resulted in a minor anastomosis failure rate and a low risk of permanent stoma.

Indexed as

Surgical StomasAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnal CanalAnastomosis, SurgicalColonFeasibility StudiesFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRectal FistulaRectal NeoplasmsAnastomotic failureColorectal/coloanal anastomosisCovering stomaRectal cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.