Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26111528›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2015

Maternal and child health nurse screening and care for mothers experiencing domestic violence (MOVE): a cluster randomised trial.

Angela J Taft, Leesa Hooker, Cathy Humphreys, Kelsey Hegarty, Ruby Walter, Catina Adams, Paul Agius, Rhonda Small

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Risk of adverse perinatal outcomes with violence in pregnancy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Angela J TaftJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. a.taft@latrobe.edu.au.
Leesa HookerJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. l.hooker@latrobe.edu.au.
Cathy HumphreysSchool of Social Work, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. cathy.humphreys@unimelb.edu.au.
Kelsey HegartyPrimary Care Research Unit, Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. k.hegarty@unimelb.edu.au.
Ruby WalterCollege of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia. Ruby.walter@vu.edu.au.
Catina AdamsJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. catinaA@hume.vic.gov.au.
Paul AgiusCentre for Population Health, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia. pagius@burnet.edu.au.
Rhonda SmallJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. r.small@latrobe.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMothers are at risk of domestic violence (DV) and its harmful consequences postpartum. There is no evidence to date for sustainability of DV screening in primary care settings. We aimed to test whether a theory-informed, maternal and child health (MCH) nurse-designed model increased and sustained DV screening, disclosure, safety planning and referrals compared with usual care.

methodsCluster randomised controlled trial of 12 month MCH DV screening and care intervention with 24 month follow-up. The study was set in community-based MCH nurse teams (91 centres, 163 nurses) in north-west Melbourne, Australia. Eight eligible teams were recruited. Team randomisation occurred at a public meeting using opaque envelopes. Teams were unable to be blinded. The intervention was informed by Normalisation Process Theory, the nurse-designed good practice model incorporated nurse mentors, strengthened relationships with DV services, nurse safety, a self-completion maternal health screening checklist at three or four month consultations and DV clinical guidelines. Usual care involved government mandated face-to-face DV screening at four weeks postpartum and follow-up as required. Primary outcomes were MCH team screening, disclosure, safety planning and referral rates from routine government data and a postal survey sent to 10,472 women with babies ≤ 12 months in study areas. Secondary outcomes included DV prevalence (Composite Abuse Scale, CAS) and harm measures (postal survey).

resultsNo significant differences were found in routine screening at four months (IG 2,330/6,381 consultations (36.5 %) versus CG 1,792/7,638 consultations (23.5 %), RR = 1.56 CI 0.96-2.52) but data from maternal health checklists (n = 2,771) at three month IG consultations showed average screening rates of 63.1 %. Two years post-intervention, IG safety planning rates had increased from three (RR 2.95, CI 1.11-7.82) to four times those of CG (RR 4.22 CI 1.64-10.9). Referrals remained low in both intervention groups (IGs) and comparison groups (CGs) (<1 %). 2,621/10,472 mothers (25 %) returned surveys. No difference was found between arms in preference or comfort with being asked about DV or feelings about self.

conclusionA nurse-designed screening and care model did not increase routine screening or referrals, but achieved significantly increased safety planning over 36 months among postpartum women. Self-completion DV screening was welcomed by nurses and women and contributed to sustainability.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12609000424202, 10/03/2009.

Indexed as

MothersAdolescentAdultAustraliaChildDomestic ViolenceFemaleHumansInfantMass ScreeningMentorsNew ZealandNursesPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26111528
PMCPMC4480893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.