Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26111527›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2015

Evolution of substrate recognition sites (SRSs) in cytochromes P450 from Apiaceae exemplified by the CYP71AJ subfamily.

Bjørn Dueholm, Célia Krieger, Damian Drew, Alexandre Olry, Tsunashi Kamo, Olivier Taboureau, Corinna Weitzel, Frédéric Bourgaud, Alain Hehn, Henrik Toft Simonsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bjørn DueholmUniversity of Copenhagen, Department of Plant and Environmental Science, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. bjorn.dueholm@mymail.unisa.edu.au.
Célia KriegerUMR1121 Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54518, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France. celia.krieger@univ-lorraine.fr.
Damian DrewUniversity of Copenhagen, Department of Plant and Environmental Science, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. drew0072@uni.flinders.edu.au.
Alexandre OlryUMR1121 Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54518, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France. alexandre.olry@univ-lorraine.fr.
Tsunashi KamoUMR1121 Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54518, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France. tkamo@affrc.go.jp.
Olivier TaboureauTechnical University of Denmark, Centre for Biological and Sequence Analysis (CBS), Anker Engelunds Vej 1, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. olivier.taboureau@univ-paris-diderot.fr.
Corinna WeitzelUniversity of Copenhagen, Department of Plant and Environmental Science, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. corinna.weitzel@web.de.
Frédéric BourgaudUMR1121 Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54518, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France. frederic.bourgaud@univ-lorraine.fr.
Alain HehnUMR1121 Université de Lorraine, 2 Avenue de la Forêt de Haye, 54518, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France. alain.hehn@univ-lorraine.fr.
Henrik Toft SimonsenUniversity of Copenhagen, Department of Plant and Environmental Science, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. hts@plen.ku.dk.
Université de Lorraine · FRUniversity of Copenhagen · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge proliferations of cytochrome P450 encoding genes resulting from gene duplications can be termed as 'blooms', providing genetic material for the genesis and evolution of biosynthetic pathways. Furanocoumarins are allelochemicals produced by many of the species in Apiaceaous plants belonging to the Apioideae subfamily of Apiaceae and have been described as being involved in the defence reaction against phytophageous insects.

resultsA bloom in the cytochromes P450 CYP71AJ subfamily has been identified, showing at least 2 clades and 6 subclades within the CYP71AJ subfamily. Two of the subclades were functionally assigned to the biosynthesis of furanocoumarins. Six substrate recognition sites (SRS1-6) important for the enzymatic conversion were investigated in the described cytochromes P450 and display significant variability within the CYP71AJ subfamily. Homology models underline a significant modification of the accession to the iron atom, which might explain the difference of the substrate specificity between the cytochromes P450 restricted to furanocoumarins as substrates and the orphan CYP71AJ.

conclusionTwo subclades functionally assigned to the biosynthesis of furanocoumarins and four other subclades were identified and shown to be part of two distinct clades within the CYP71AJ subfamily. The subclades show significant variability within their substrate recognition sites between the clades, suggesting different biochemical functions and providing insights into the evolution of cytochrome P450 'blooms' in response to environmental pressures.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationAmino Acid SequenceApiaceaeCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySequence AlignmentSubstrate SpecificityCytochrome P-450 Enzyme System

Identifiers

PMID26111527
PMCPMC4482195
OpenAlexW1608678757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.