Trial reportChest2015
The Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Research Network (IPFnet): diagnostic and adjudication processes.
Trial report in Chest, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sildenafil Trial of Exercise Performance in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Prednisone, Azathioprine, and N-acetylcysteine: A Study That Evaluates Response in IPF
AntiCoagulant Effectiveness in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (ACE-IPF)
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Telomere Length and Use of Immunosuppressive Medications in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019Trial
- Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: application of the diagnostic criteria and the role of respiratory intermediate care unit and mechanical ventilation.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2025Article
- Meaningful Endpoints for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) Clinical Trials: Emphasis on 'Feels, Functions, Survives'. Report of a Collaborative Discussion in a Symposium with Direct Engagement from Representatives of Patients, Investigators, the National Institutes of Health, a Patient Advocacy Organization, and a Regulatory Agency.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical manifestations and prognostic factors analysis of patients hospitalised with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other interstitial lung diseases.BMJ open respiratory research · 2024Article
- An adjudication algorithm for respiratory-related hospitalisation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Telomere length associates with chronological age and mortality across racially diverse pulmonary fibrosis cohorts.Nature communications · 2023Article
- MIXTURE of human expertise and deep learning-developing an explainable model for predicting pathological diagnosis and survival in patients with interstitial lung disease.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022Article
- COVID-19 Vaccine in Patients with Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022Article
- An updated approach to determine minimal clinically important differences in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.ERJ open research · 2021Article
- Reliability of histopathologic diagnosis of fibrotic interstitial lung disease: an international collaborative standardization project.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: who to treat, how to treat.Current pulmonology reports · 2019Article
- Approaching Clinical Trials in Childhood Interstitial Lung Disease and Pediatric Pulmonary Fibrosis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019Review
- Validated imaging biomarkers as decision-making tools in clinical trials and routine practice: current status and recommendations from the EIBALL* subcommittee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR).Insights into imaging · 2019Article
- Pharmacological management of progressive-fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: a review of the current evidence.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2018Review
- A Standardized Diagnostic Ontology for Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease. An International Working Group Perspective.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2017Article
- Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2017Review
- Acute Exacerbation in Interstitial Lung Disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored IPF Clinical Research Network (IPFnet) studies enrolled subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) to evaluate drug therapies in treatment trials. An adjudication committee (AC) provided a structured review of cases in which there was uncertainty or disagreement regarding diagnosis or clinical event classification. This article describes the diagnosis and adjudication processes.
methodsThe diagnostic process was based on review of clinical data and high-resolution CT scans with central review of lung biopsies when available. The AC worked closely with the data coordinating center to obtain clinical, radiologic, and histologic data and to communicate with the clinical centers. The AC used a multidisciplinary discussion model with four clinicians, one radiologist, and one pathologist to adjudicate diagnosis and outcome measures.
resultsThe IPFnet trials screened 1,015 subjects; of these, 23 cases required review by the AC to establish eligibility. The most common diagnosis for exclusion was suspected chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The AC reviewed 88 suspected acute exacerbations (AExs), 93 nonelective hospitalizations, and 16 cases of bleeding. Determination of AEx presented practical challenges to adjudicators, as necessary clinical data were often not collected, particularly when subjects were evaluated outside of the primary study site.
conclusionsThe IPFnet diagnostic process was generally efficient, but a multidisciplinary adjudication committee was critical to assure correct phenotype for study enrollment. The AC was key in adjudicating all adverse outcomes in two IPFnet studies terminated early because of safety issues. Future clinical trials in IPF should consider logistical and cost issues as they incorporate AExs and hospitalizations as outcome measures. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00517933, NCT00650091, NCT00957242; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.