Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26111008›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Ultrasonic Nanobubbles Carrying Anti-PSMA Nanobody: Construction and Application in Prostate Cancer-Targeted Imaging.

Xiaozhou Fan, Luofu Wang, Yanli Guo, Zhui Tu, Lang Li, Haipeng Tong, Yang Xu, Rui Li, Kejing Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Nanobodies Enhancing Cancer Visualization, Diagnosis and Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Nanobodies: new avenue to treat kidney disease.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaozhou FanDepartment of Ultrasound, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Luofu WangDepartment of Urology, Daping Hospital, Institute of Surgery Research, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yanli GuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhui TuState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
Lang LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Haipeng TongDepartment of Ultrasound, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yang XuState Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China; Jiangxi-QAI Joint Research Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
Rui LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Kejing FangDepartment of Ultrasound, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To facilitate prostate cancer imaging using targeted molecules, we constructed ultrasonic nanobubbles coupled with specific anti-PSMA (prostate specific membrane antigen) nanobodies, and evaluated their in vitro binding capacity and in vivo imaging efficacy. The "targeted" nanobubbles, which were constructed via a biotin-streptavidin system, had an average diameter of 487.60 ± 33.55 nm and carried the anti-PSMA nanobody as demonstrated by immunofluorescence. Microscopy revealed targeted binding of nanobubbles in vitro to PSMA-positive cells. Additionally, ultrasonography indicators of nanobubble imaging (including arrival time, peak time, peak intensity and enhanced duration) were evaluated for the ultrasound imaging in three kinds of animal xenografts (LNCaP, C4-2 and MKN45), and showed that these four indicators of targeted nanobubbles exhibited significant differences from blank nanobubbles. Therefore, this study not only presents a novel approach to target prostate cancer ultrasonography, but also provides the basis and methods for constructing small-sized and high-efficient targeted ultrasound nanobubbles.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, SurfaceCell Line, TumorGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansMaleMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceMolecular ImagingNeoplasm TransplantationProstatic NeoplasmsProtein BindingSingle-Domain AntibodiesAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IISingle-Domain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID26111008
PMCPMC4481414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.